DELIBERATIVE COMMUNICATION MODEL IN HANDLING “WRONG TYPING” DISCOURSE TO IMPROVE PUBLIC SERVICE QUALITY

Annys Zaidha Dahlia Dina, Henni Gusfa

Abstract


Managing very large, massive information with negative sentiments in virtual space is a challenge for the government in the era of information technology development. The purpose of the study is to describe the deliberative communication model carried out by the Ministry of State Secretariat in dealing with the discourse of typos in Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation in order to improve the quality of public services. The researcher uses the constructivist paradigm, with the intrinsic case study method, R. Stake, because the case still has an impact today. The main data is a record of the information management process using digital technology in a virtual room supported by interviews, mass media documentation from the internet, literature studies and books. The data were analyzed by the Miles & Huberman method, which was reduced, displayed and then concluded and the validity of the data was using the triangulation technique of data sources. This study uses Organizational Information Theory, Karl Weick with the concept of deliberative communication ofered by Thomas Englund. The results show that the deliberative communication model carried out by the Ministry of State Secretariat is by maximizing digital technology, listening, deliberation, policy, evaluating and continuity. Listening by analyzing the arguments of the virtual community that developed in the mass media, then carrying out internal deliberation by considering the three validity claims (truth, honesty and accuracy). The results of the deliberation are conveyed to the public in the form of a policy to then be evaluated in order to see the shared meaning of the value of the policy itself and this is done continuously. This empirical phenomenon is the deliberative communication model carried out by the Ministry of State Secretariat.

Full Text:

PDF

References


APJII. (2020). APJII 2019 – 2020 internet survey report. Association of Indonesian Internet Service Providers, 2020, 1–146. https://apjii.or.id/survei

Arifn, A. (2010). Public Opinion. Grammar Publishing.

Astungkoro, R., Nugroho, AS, Akbar, NA, & Saputri, DS (2020, November). “Wrongly Typing Law Happened Several Times, But This Is Diferent.” REPUBLIKA.CO.ID. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/qj9b5j328/salah-type-uu-multiple-kali-terhap-but- ini-beda

Budi, R. (2012). Efective Communication in Improving the Quality of Public Services. Stimulus. Bungin, B. (2021). Qualitative Research in Communication, Economics, Public Policy, and Other

Social Sciences (Third). date.

Caspary, WR (2008). On dewey, habermas and deliberative democracy. Journal of Public Deliberation, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.71

Denzin, NK, & Lincoln, YS (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research (Dariyatno, BS Fata, Abi, & J. Rinaldi (eds.)). Yogyakarta.

Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 503–520.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600670775

Gold, V., Holzinger, K., & Rohrdantz, C. (2018). Towards Automating the Measurement of Deliberative Communication. Working Papers. http://www.kenbenoit.net/pdfs/NDATAD2013/Goldetal2013_Towards Automating the Measurement of Deliberative Communication.pdf

Hardiansyah. (2015). Public Service Communication Concepts and Applications. http://eprints.binadarma.ac.id/3822/1/Communication of Public Services.pdf

Hardiman, FB (2009). Deliberative Democracy: Considering the State of Law and Public Space in the Discourse Theory of Jurgen Habermas (Priotomo (ed.)). Canisius.

Presidential Instruction of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2015 concerning the Management of Public Communication, (2015).

Littlejohn, SW, & Foss, KA (2016). Encyclopedia of Communication Theory (T. Wibowo (ed.); Volume 1). date.

Maharani, T. (2020, November 3). Observer: Typing Errors in the Job Creation Act Cannot Be Corrected Carelessly. KOMPAS.Com. observer: Typing Errors in the Job Creation Law Cannot Be Corrected Carelessly%0A%0A This article has been published on Kompas.com with the title%22 Observer: Typing Errors in the Employment Creation Law Cannot be Corrected Carelessly%22, Click to read: https://national .compa

Mulyana, D. (2014). Communication Science An Introduction (18th ed.). PT. Rosdakarya Youth. Nasrallah, R. (2012). The Internet and the Virtual Public Space, A Refection on Habermas’

Theory of Public Space. Journal of Communicators, 4(1), 27–35. http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jkm/article/view/188

Regulation of the Minister of State Secretary Number 5 of 2020 concerning Organization and Work Procedure of the Ministry of State Secretariat, (2020).

Pujileksono, S. (2015). Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Intrans Publishing. pun/sf. (2020). DPR Ofcially Submits Final Draft of the Ciptaker Law to the State Secretariat. DPR RI.

https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/30438/t/DPR+Resmi+Submit+Draf+Final+UU+Ciptaker+ke+Setneg

Sobur, A. (2014). Encyclopedia of Communication (NS Nurbaya (ed.)). Media Rekatama Symbiosis.

RI Law Number 11 Year 2O2O Concerning Job Creation, (2020). RI Law Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services, (2009).

West, R., & Turner, LH (2017). Introduction to Communication Theory of Analysis and Applications (5th ed.). Salemba Humanika.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.