ANALISA PERBANDINGAN GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL (GWP) DAN OZONE DEPLETION POTENTIAL (ODP), PADA REFRIGERAN R32, R290, R407C, R410A, SEBAGAI PENGGANTI R22

Rohman sugiono, Urip Prayogi

Abstract


Kondisi lingkungan saat ini menjadi topik utama seluruh dunia, terutama masalah lingkungan seperti pemanasan global, penipisan lapisan ozon dan polusi udara. Ozone Depleting Potential (ODP) dan Global Warming Potential (GWP) menjadi masalah serius yang harus dipertimbangkan dalam pengembangan sistem pendingin. Refrigeran HCFC (R22) memiliki nilai ODP dan GWP tinggi yang menyebabkan kerusakan lingkungan. Oleh karena itu, peneliti mengembangkan refrigeran ramah lingkungan berbasis hidrokarbon (HC). Refrigerant yang digunakan sebagai pembanding adalah R32, R290, R407C, dan R410A. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dan bersifat deskriptif untuk menjelaskan refrigerant yang ramah lingkungan dari refrigerant R32, R290, R407C dan R410A, yang akan digunakan sebagai pengganti dari refrigerant R22. Penekanan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah penjelasan tentang Global Warning Potential dan Ozon Depletion Potential dari Refrigerant R32, R290, R407C, R410A. R-32 jauh lebih aman dibandingan dengan jenis refrigerant yang lainnya, namun beberapa mesin pendingin tidak compatible dengan refrigerant tersebut sehingga R-22 masih mendominasi penggunaan refrigerant. R-290 (propane) juga termasuk ke dalam klasifikasi hidrokarbon karena memiliki ODP dan GWP yang rendah. Jadi tersisa dua refrigerant yang bisa dijadikan sebagai pengganti R22, R407C dan R410A. Dibandingkan dengan R410A, R407C jauh lebih aman untuk lingkungan, karena memiliki nilai GWP yang lebih rendah dari R410A. Jika Protokol Montreal dan Kyoto dilaksanakan secara penuh dan konsisten, maka secara umum pada saat ini belum ada pilihan refrigerant komersial selain refrigerant alami.

Keywords


Refrigeran, ODP, GWP, R22

References


Antunes, A. H. P. & Filho, E. P. B. (2016). Experimental investigation on the performance and global environmental impact of a refrigeration system retrofitted with alternative refrigerants. International Journal of Refrigeration, 16(3019), 1-8.

ASHRAE, “ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamental”, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, 2009.

Brown, J.S., Yana-motta, S.F. & Domanski, P. a, 2002. Comparitive analysis of an automotive air conditioning systems operating with CO 2 and R134a. International Journal of Refrigeration 25 (2002) 19–32, 25, pp.19–32.

Dalkilic, a. S. & Wongwises, S., 2010. A performance comparison of vapourcompression refrigeration system using various alternative refrigerants. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 37(9), pp.1340–1349.

Fannou, Jean-Louis Comlan., Clement R, Louis L., Stanislaw Kajl. 2015. A Comparative Performance Study Of A Direct Expansion Geothermal Evaporator Using R410A and R407C As Refrigerant Alternatives to R22. Thermal Technology Center (TTC), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ecole de Technologie Sup West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada

Han, X.H. et al., 2013. Cycle performances of the mixture HFC-161 + HFC-134a as the substitution of HFC-134a in automotive air conditioning systems. International Journal of Refrigeration, 36(3), pp.913–920.

Li, G. et al., 2014. Experimental investigation of energy and exergy performance of secondary loop automotive airconditioning systems using low-GWP (global warming potential) refrigerants.Energy, 68, pp.819–831.

Mahajan, R.Y. & Borikar, S.A., 2014. Performance Evaluation of Domestic Refrigerator Using Hc- 12a Refrigerant as an Alternative Refrigerant to R12 And R134a. The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, 3(10), pp.26–37.

Mc Linden, M.O., Brown, J. S., Brignoli, R., Kazakov, A. F & Domanski, P.A. (2017). Limited options for low-global-warmingpotential refrigerants. Nature Communications, 8(14476), 1-9.

Nagalakshmi, K. & Yadav, G.M., 2014. The Design and Performance Analysis of Refrigeration System Using R12 & R134a Refrigerants. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(2), pp.638–643.

Padalkar, A.S. Mali, K.V. & Devotta, S. (2014). Simulated and experimental performance of split packaged air conditioner using refrigerant HC290 as a substitute for HCFC-22. Applied Thermal Engineering, 62(1), 277-284.

Pérez-García, V. et al., 2013. Comparative study of transcritical vapor compression configurations using CO2 as refrigeration mode base on simulation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 51(1–2), pp.1038–1046.

Purwanta, Wahyu. 2009. Perhitungan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca (GRK) dari Sektor Sampah Perkotaan di Indonesia. Jakarta. J. Tek.Ling Vol 10 No 1 Hal 1-8 ISSN 1441-318X

Sarkar, J. & Bhattacharyya, S., 2009. Assessment of blends of CO2 with butane and isobutane as working fluids for heat pump applications. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 48(7), pp.1460–1465.

Sunardi, Cecep., Sutandi T., Putra ADD., Kosasih A. 2019. Pengaruh Refrigeran R-22 Dan Mc-22 Terhadap Performansi Sistem Refrigerasi Brine Cooling. Bandung. Seminar Nasional Edusainstek ISBN : 2685-5852 FMIPA UNIMUS 2019

Taib, M. Y., Aziz, A. A. & Alias, A. B. S. (2010). Performance analysis of a domestic air conditioner. National Conference in Mechanical Engineering Research and Postgraduate Students, 582-291.

United Nations, 1998. Kyoto Protocol To the United Nations Framework Convention and Climate Change, 1998

Wang, K. et al., 2010. Review of secondary loop refrigeration systems. International Journal of Refrigeration, 33(2), pp.212–234.

Yadav, P. & Sharma, A., 2015. Exergy Analysis of R134a Based Vapour Compression Refrigeration Tutor. In National Conference on Advances in Engineering, Technology and Management. Sadopur: Maharishi Markandeshwar University, pp. 73–77.

Yıldırım, C., Özkan, D. B. & Onan, C. (2017).

Theoretical study of R32 to replace R410A in variable refrigerant flow systems. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 39(1), 87-92.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/jtm.v11i1.10992

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Teknik Mesin

Jurnal Teknik Mesin (JTM)
Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Mercu Buana
Jl. Meruya Selatan No. 01, Kembangan, Jakarta Barat 11650, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]
Telp.: 021-5840815/ 021-5840816 (Hunting)
Fax.: 021-5871335

JTM is indexed by the following abstracting and indexing services:

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats