Memperbaiki Kinerja Mutu dengan Menggunakan Metode FMEA pada Industri Karung Tenun Polypropylene

Kemas Muhammat Abdul Fatah; Wisnaningsih Wisnaningsih

doi:10.22441/MBCIE.2023.028

Authors

Kemas Muhammat Abdul Fatah Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai, Indonesia
Wisnaningsih Wisnaningsih Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22441/MBCIE.2023.028

Keywords:

Capability Process, FMEA, Woven Sack

Abstract

The quality failure rate in the production process in the form of defective products, scrap products, rework, rejection, and waste is an indicator of a company's quality performance, especially with regard to cost quality. Failure in the production process will increase the rate of defects, scrap, rework, rejection, and waste, which in turn will increase the cost of quality. This study uses the FMEA method to fight identified failures from gemba walk activities. Improvements made using the FMEA method with several recommendations for improvement solutions can reduce failures, this can be seen by comparing the RPN values. The RPN failure value in the extrusion process which affected the hollow or loose PP woven sacks decreased to 98 from 490, and which resulted in lighter sack weight decreased to 98 from 490. The decrease occurred due to the achievement of the process capability value (Cpk) which was as expected ie 1.36 for denier specifications and 1.33 for yarn bandwidth specifications. This Cpk achievement has an impact on a decrease of the occurrence (o) level. Meanwhile, the failure of the RPN value in the weaving process which had an impact on products returned by customers, decreased to 98 from 490. The decrease occurred because the weaving process operator was given the responsibility to carry out maintenance and cleanliness of the machine which resulted in a decrease of the occurrence (o) level.

Author Biographies

Kemas Muhammat Abdul Fatah, Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Teknik Industri

Wisnaningsih Wisnaningsih, Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Teknik Industri

References

Altuntas, S., & Kansu, S. (2019). An innovative and integrated approach based on SERVQUAL, QFD and FMEA for service quality improvement: A case study. Kybernetes, 49(10), 2419–2453. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2019-0269

Arabsheybani, A., Paydar, M. M., & Safaei, A. S. (2018). An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.167

Carvalho, A. V., Enrique, D. V., Chouchene, A., & Charrua-Santos, F. (2021). Quality 4.0: An overview. Procedia Computer Science, 181(2019), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.176

Dalton, J. (2019). Gemba Kaizen. In Great Big Agile: An OS for Agile Leaders (pp. 175–176). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4206-3

Fatah, K. M. A. (2022). Menghilangkan Keluhan Pelanggan Dengan Menggunakan Teknik Poka-Yoke Sederhana Berbiaya Murah. J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 17(3), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.17.3.168-173

Fattahi, R., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2018). Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Safety Science, 102(July 2017), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.018

Godina, R., Silva, B. G. R., & Espadinha-Cruz, P. (2021). A DMAIC integrated fuzzy fmea model: A case study in the automotive industry. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11083726

Kumar, P., Maiti, J., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Impact of quality management systems on firm performance. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 35(5), 1034–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2017-0030

Lo, H. W., & Liou, J. J. H. (2018). A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 73, 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.09.020

Maryani, E., Purwanto, A., Kartika, H., Haris, M., Ihsan, N., Fatah, K. M. A., & Pramono, R. (2020). Do gemba kaizen and 5s reinforce medical equipment manufacturing performance ? 07(07), 41–57.

Mete, S. (2019). Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 25(7), 1645–1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1546115

Özilgen, S., & Özilgen, M. (2017). General template for the FMEA applications in primary food processing. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, 161, 29–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2016_52

Peeters, J. F. W., Basten, R. J. I., & Tinga, T. (2018). Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 172(November 2017), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.024

Rana, S., & Belokar, R. M. (2017). Quality Improvement Using FMEA: A Short Review. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(6), 263–267. https://irjet.net/archives/V4/i6/IRJET-V4I645.pdf

Spreafico, C., Russo, D., & Rizzi, C. (2017). A state-of-the-art review of FMEA/FMECA including patents. Computer Science Review, 25, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2017.05.002

Sturm, S., Kaiser, G., & Hartmann, E. (2019). Long-run dynamics between cost of quality and quality performance. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 36(8), 1438–1453. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2018-0118

The Council Six Sigma Certification. (2018). Six Sigma A Complete Step-by-Step Guide. In The Council for Six Sigma Certification. https://www.sixsigmacouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Six-Sigma-A-Complete-Step-by-Step-Guide.pdf

Trafialek, J., & Kolanowski, W. (2014). Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) for audit of HACCP system. Food Control, 44, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.036