ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF HEXACO PERSONALITY INVENTORY REVISED INSTRUMENTS: PSYCHOMETRICS PROPERTIES BASED ON THE RASCH MODEL

Tina Deviana, Laila Meiliyandrie Indah Wardani

Abstract


Background: Assessment of personality traits of general population is important within the field of psychology. The HEXACO PI-R, one of a foundational measure which consist 60-items was developed to investigate person’s personality traits. Although HEXACO-60 has often been used in clinical, personality and organizational research, one of the major issues surrounding this instrument is that of an appropriate psychometric properties.

Research Purpose: This paper describes the development and initial validation of an Indonesian version of the HEXACO-60.

Methodology: A quantitative, cross-sectional research design with convenience sampling was used. Rasch analysis using Rating Scale Model (RSM) was used to study the dimensionality of the scale, the adjustment of each one of the items, the reliability values for the items and for the people, the validity of the construct, and the functioning of the response categories.

Population and Sample: A total of 320 participants from general population completed the Indonesian version of the HEXACO-60.

Results: Based on RSM analysis, we confirm that the Indonesian version of the HEXACO-60 maintains an adequate internal consistency and a unidimensional structure. We observed a good alignment between the question and the person’s abilities as soon as a high reliability for the items. Although the sample is large enough to corroborate the difficulty hierarchy of the items, the construct validity could be improved by introducing items of moderate and high difficulty.

Conclusion and suggestions: In general, the results show adequate psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the HEXACO-60, so we recommend the use of six domain scores from the Indonesian HEXACO-60 in future research.

 

Keywords: Rasch model, psychometric properties, Hexaco-PI-R

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asthon, Lee. (2009). The Hexaco-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality. Journal of Personality Assessment 91(4), 340–345, DOI: 10.1080/00223890902935878

Beaton, DE & Guillemin, F. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural

Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Journal of SPINE. 25(24), 3186-3191.

De Vries (20110). The 24 item Brief Hexaco Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, (2013) 871-880, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003

DiStefano, C., & Morgan, G. B. (2010). Evaluation of the BESS TRS-CA using the Rasch rating scale model. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 202–212. doi:10.1037/a0021509

Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192. doi:10.1177/ 002224378802500207

Kim, S., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2006). Rasch rating scale modeling of data from the standardized letter of recommendation (ETS Research Report RR-06 33). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

Linacre, J. M. (1998). Detecting multidimen-sionality: Which residual data-type works best? Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 266–283.

Linacre, J. M. (2008). WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program [Version 3.65.0]. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.

Mair, P. (2018). Modern psychometrics with R. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

Yen, W. M. (1984). Effects of local item dependence on the fit and equating performance of the three-parameter logistic model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 125-145. doi:10.1177/014662168400800201


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 IPRC

Tim Editorial Office

Office: Faculty of Psychology, University of Mercu Buana 

(Campus-A Meruya) Building D 202, 2nd Floor Jalan Meruya Selatan No. 1, Kembangan, West Jakarta

Phone: +62 858 857 92245 (WhatsApp text only)

Email: [email protected]

Website: https://iprc.mercubuana.ac.id/