ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KINERJA KEUANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH

Abdul Rohman, Rochmawati Daud, Ubaidillah Ubaidillah

Abstract


Our study wants to test whether opinions, accrual levels, and accruals are influential or not on the financial performance of local governments. the use of accrual accretion using the five Healy model, Angelo, Hribar, Jones, and modification is expected to capture more thoroughly each local government management policy related to financial management accrual discretion and the preparation of local government financial reports. The results of processing data show that the first model (Healy, Angelo, Jones, and Modification) shows results that reject the alternative hypothesis. The third research model, Hribar, showed positive results, namely accepting alternative hypotheses. We use the SPSS statistical tool to carry out multiple regression testing. The first hypothesis shows a negative result so that it is rejected ie opinion does not affect financial performance. The second hypothesis, the level of accruals influences financial performance is rejected. While accruals (H3) are accepted. And together these three variables have a weak influence on the financial performance of local governments. The hribar model accruals discretion shows the existence of factors that influence financial performance derived from several factors. Hribar accrual formulation is influenced by two factors, namely cash flow and budget realization (deficit). Thus the authors conclude that the accrual policy in the financial statements of local governments is influenced by surplus (deficit budget realization) and local government cash flows. Opinion and accrual levels do not affect the government's financial performance.

Keywords


Reports on Audit Results; Opinion; Total Accruals; Accrual Discretion; Financial Performance; Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan; Opini; Total Akrual; Diskresi Akrual; Kinerja Keuangan

References


Arcas, M. J., & Marti, R. H. (2012). Earning Management in ENglish Local Governments: Determining Factors and Instruments. Research Project Sapnish R & D ECON2010-17463.

Bontas, C. B., & Petre, M. C. (October 2009). Arguments for Intriducing Accrual based Accounting in The Public Sector. MPRA Paper No 1813.

Bravo, A. B. (2002). Local Government Behavior and Principal_agent Theory. Academia Militar CIEF (Technical University of Lisbon), 1-13.

Chan, J. L. (2008). Accrual Accounting: Concepts, Standars, and Implementation. Chicago: University Of Illinois.

Chan, J. L. (2010). IPSAS: COnseptual and Institutional Issues. Chan GA Seminar (hal. 13). US: -.

Chan, P. J. (2010). Government FInancial Accounting Principles. Beijing: Chan Lecture 3.

Davis, N. (2010). Accrual Accounting and Australian Public Sector – A Legitimation Explanation. Australian Accounting Business anda Finance Journal . Vol 4. Issue 2.

Dechow, P. S., & Sweeney. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 193-25.

DeFond, M. a. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of Accrual . Journal of accounting and economics, 145–76.

Hribar, P., & Collins, D. W. (2002). Errors in Estimating Accruals: Implications for Empirical Research . Journal Of Accounting Research, (pages 105–134).

Jensen, M. C., & H.Meckling, W. (1976). Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal Of FInancial Economics, 305-360.

Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal Accounting Research, 193–228.

Jovanovic, T. (2015). Public sector Accounting in Slovenia and Croatia. Public Finance and Accounting.

Leone, A., & Van Horn, R. (2005). How do nonprofit hospitals manage earnings?. Journal of Health Economics, 24:4, pp815–37.

Marand, A. A., Shabani, M., & Hnema, M. (2014). The Effectiveness of replacing accrual instead of cash base in the public sector accounting and budgeting. Indian Journal Of Fundamental and Applied Life Science, 2231-6345.

Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ofoegbu, D., & N, G. (2014). New Public Management and Accrual Accounting Basis for Transparancy anda Accountability in The Nigerian Public Sector. IOSR Journal of Business and Management Vol 16 Issue 7 ver III, 104-113.

Perrin, D. H., & Whiteoak, M. E. (1993). Public sector Accounting and Financial Control. London: Chapman and Hall.

PWC. (2014). Collection of Information Related to The Potentioal Impact, Including Cost, of Implementing accrual Accounting in teh public sector and technical analysis of the Suitability of individual IPSAS Standar. -: PWC.

Subramanyam, K., & Wild, J. (2010). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Tudor, A. T., & Mutiu, A. (2006). Cash Versus accrual accounting in public sector. Universitas Babes Bolyai, Cluj Napoca.

Warfield, T. W., & Wild, K. (1995). Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnigs. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61-91.

Yamamoto, K. (2012). Theoritical Framework for Analysing Accounting Developments: in Case of Local Government Accounting in Japan. University of Tokyo.

Zimmerman, R. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 131-156.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/profita.2019.v12.01.003

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Profita : Komunikasi Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Perpajakan

Portal ISSNPrint ISSN: 2086-7662
Online ISSN: 2622-1950

Creative Commons License
The Profita: Komunikasi Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Perpajakan and its articles is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Tim Editorial Office
Profita: Komunikasi Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Perpajakan

Universitas Mercu Buana
Jl. Raya Meruya Selatan, Kembangan, Jakarta-11650
Telp.021-5840816 Ext. 5302, Fax. 021-5871312
Jakarta
Email. ([email protected]).
Website. (http://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/profita)