The Dynamics of Self-Quality and Partner Perception in Predicting Swiping Intentions

Mia Audina Olivia

Abstract


This qualitative study delves into the user’s comprehension and interpretation of their own qualities and those of potential partners during the decision-making process of online dating applications. Employing an exploratory design, in-depth interviews were conducted with six purposively selected participants. The analysis employed a thematic approach, utilizing Saldaña’s coding cycle. This approach commenced with initial/open coding and progressed to focused/axial coding. The study presents four key insights. Firstly, users construct their self-quality through a combination of physical appearance, personal competencies, and feedback received from other users. These factors collectively shape their self-image within the digital dating environment. Secondly, the quality of potential partners is assessed through rapid judgments based on photographs, profile information, personal values, and perceived compatibility. Thirdly, swiping decisions are influenced by subjective interpretations, emotional states, and reflections that arise after interactions. Lastly, users perceive the online dating environment as a competitive space that impacts their strategies, standards, and self-worth. Collectively, these findings indicate that swiping is not a mere technical action, but a cognitive and emotional process shaped by the interplay of individual factors, digital contexts, and social experiences.

Keywords


partner quality, self-quality, swiping

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnocky, S. (2018). Self-perceived mate value, facial attractiveness, and mate preferences: Do desirable men want it all?. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(1), 1474704918763271. doi:10.1177/1474704918763271

Bajnaid, A., Alessandro Veltri, G., Elyas, T., & Masa’Deh, R. E. (2019). Computer-mediated communication perspective on theories of mating relationships: A literature review. Journal of Internet Social Networking & Virtual Communities, 2019, 1-15. doi:10.5171/2019.432051

Bandinelli, C. (2022). “Dating Apps: Towards Post-Romantic Love in Digital Societies.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 28(7):905–19. doi:10.1080/10286632.2022.2137157.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.

Bandura, Albert. 2002. “Social Foundations of Thought and Action.” Pp. 94–106 in The Health Psychology Reader. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd.

Bruch, E. E., & Newman, M. E. (2018). Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets. Science Advances, 4(8), eaap9815. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aap9815

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Harper, Kaitlyn T., Fiona Stanley, Morgan J. Sidari, Anthony J. Lee, and Brendan P. Zietsch. 2024. “The Role of Accurate Self-Assessments in Optimizing Mate Choice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 50(4):587–96. doi:10.1177/01461672221135955.

Leesch, Julia, Tomáš Katrňák, and Jan Skopek. 2024. “Structural Opportunities or Assortative Mating? – Decomposing Trends and Country Differences in Educational Sorting Outcomes in Marriages.” European Societies 26(4):1137–69. doi:10.1080/14616696.2023.2290238.

Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J., Valentine, K. A., & Balliet, D. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), 757. doi:10.1037/a0033777

Li, W., Tan, J., Meng, W., & Wang, Y. (2020). A swipe-based unlocking mechanism with supervised learning on smartphones: Design and evaluation. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 165, 102687. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102687

Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.

Nascimento, Bruna S., Lora Adair, and Katia Vione. 2024. “Pathways to Online Infidelity: The Roles of Perceived Online Dating Success, Perceived Availability of Alternative Partners, and Mate Value Discrepancy.” Current Psychology 43(14):12782–93. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05345-y.

Olivera-La Rosa, Antonio, Olber Eduardo Arango-Tobón, and Gordon P. D. Ingram. 2019. “Swiping Right: Face Perception in the Age of Tinder.” Heliyon 5(12):e02949. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02949.

Pidoux, J. (2023). A comparative study of algorithmic–user classification practices in online dating: a human–machine learning process. Porn Studies, 10(2), 191-209. doi:10.1080/23268743.2022.2104352

Prall, Sean, and Brooke Scelza. 2022. “The Effect of Mating Market Dynamics on Partner Preference and Relationship Quality among Himba Pastoralists.” Science Advances 8(18). doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm5629.

Ranzini, Giulia, and Christoph Lutz. 2017. “Love at First Swipe? Explaining Tinder Self-Presentation and Motives.” Mobile Media & Communication 5(1):80–101. doi:10.1177/2050157916664559.

Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(5), 508. doi:10.1037/h0021188

Wang, S., Yang, W., Xia, Y., Yan, W., & Cai, Z. (2025). Analysis of dating app classification and predictors of dating app addiction based on user experience factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13(1), 50. doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06301-w

Ward, J. (2017). What are you doing on Tinder? Impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1644-1659. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252412

Wong, William CW, Wai Han Sun, Shu Ming Cheryl Chia, Joseph D. Tucker, William PH Mak, Lin Song, Kitty Wai Ying Choi, Stephanie Tsz Hei Lau, and Eric Yuk Fai Wan. 2020. “Effectiveness of a Peer-Led Web-Based Intervention to Improve General Self-Efficacy in Using Dating Apps Among Young Adults: Randomized Clustered Trial.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 22(10):e16378. doi:10.2196/16378.

Xiao, Siqi, and Yue Qian. 2020. “Mate Selection among Online Daters in Shanghai: Why Does Education Matter?” Chinese Journal of Sociology 6(4):521–46. doi:10.1177/2057150X20957422.

Yasemin Erol, Ruth, and Ulrich Orth. 2016. “Self-Esteem and the Quality of Romantic Relationships.” European Psychologist 21(4):274–83. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000259.

Young, Diane S., and Erin A. Casey. 2018. “An Examination of the Sufficiency of Small Qualitative Samples.” Social Work Research. doi:10.1093/swr/svy026.

Zhang, Y., & Santtila, P. (2024). Predictors and memory consequences of dating decisions in a dating app-analogue study. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 6, e31. doi:10.1017/ehs.2024.22




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/biopsikososial.v10i1.37183

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Biopsikososial: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Mercubuana Jakarta

Print ISSN: 2599-0470

Online ISSN: 2598-4918


JBUMBand its articles is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Tim Editorial Office

JBUMB

Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Mercu Buana

Jalan Meruya Selatan No. 1, Kembangan, Jakarta Barat, 11650, Indonesia