Moderating Impact of Strategic Vision To The Relationship of Strategic Involvement With Environmental Uncertainty, Competitive Strength, Job Involvement, and Organizational Commitment

Agus Fauzi

Abstract


This research aims to understand the moderating impact of strategic vision to the relationship of strategic involvement with environment uncertainty, competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment. The sample of this research are 72 officials of Muhammadiyah universities in Indonesia which are called Rector, Chief, Director, Vice of Rector, Vice of Chief, Vice of Director, and Dean.

This research use survey method with questionnaire as research instrument and nonprobability sampling method, specifically purposive sampling in particular. To test the validity we use confirmatory factor analysis and to test reliability we use coefficient of cronbach’s alpha. To test the hypotheses we use moderated regression analysis.

The result of this research shows that strategic involvement is positively related and significant to environment uncertainty, competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Strategic vision does not moderate the relationship of strategic involvement with environment uncertainty, but it moderates the relationship of strategic involvement with competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment. 


Keywords


Strategic Vision, Strategic Involvement, Environment Uncertainty, Competitive Strength, Job Involvement, Organizational Commitment.

Full Text:

XML PDF

References


Bourgoeouis, lll, L.J. 1985. Strategic goal, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environment. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (3): 548-573.

Conger, J.A. 1989. The Charismatic Leader: Beyond The Mystique of Exceptional Leadership, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Dubin, R. 1956. Industrial worker’s world: a study of central life interests of industrial workers, Social Problem, dalam Blau,G.J. 1985. A multiple study investigation of the dimensionality of job involvement. Journal of Vicational Behavior, 9: 19-36.

Gordon.L.A & Narayanan, V.K. 1984. Management accounting systems, perceived environment uncertainty, and organizational structure: an empirical investigation. Accounting Organization & Social, 9 (1): 33-47.

Hair, J.F. Jr., R.E. Anderson, R.L.Atham, & W.C. Black 1998. Multivariate data Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice hall,Inc.

Huselid,M.A & Day,N.E. 1991. Organizational commitment, job involvement, and turnover: a substantive and methodological analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 380-391.

Ireland,R.D., Hitt, M.A., & de Porras, D.A. 1987. Strategy formulation process differences in perception of strength and weaknesses indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 459-485.

Kanungo,R.N. 1982. Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 341-349.

Kelly,D. 2000. Using vision to improve organizational communication. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21 (2): 92-101.

Larwood,L., Falbe, C.M., Kringer, M.P, & Miesing, P. 1995. Structure and meaning of organizational vision. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3): 740-769.

Nanus,B. 1992. Visionary Leadership: Creating A Compelling Sense of Direction For Your Organization. san Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Oswald,S.L., Mossholder, K.W. & Harris, S.G. 1994. Vision salience and strategic involvement: implication for psychological attachment to organizational and job. Strategic management Journal, 15: 477-489.

Oswald,S.L., Mossholder, K.W. & Harris, S.G. 1997. Relations between strategic involvement and manager’s perception’s of environment and competitive strengths. Group & Organization management, 22 (3): 343-365.

Parnell, J.A., Lester, D.L., & Menefee M.L. 2000. Strategy as response to organizational uncertainty: an alternative perspective on the strategy-performance relationship. Management Decision, 38 (8): 520-530.

Porter, M. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques For Analyzing Industries and Competitor, New York: Free Press.

Sekaran,U. 2003. Research Methods For Business, 4 ed, New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Strickland,A.J. & Thompson,A.A. 2003. Strategic Management: Concept and Cases, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int.Inc.

Sutcliffe, A.M. 1994. What executive notice: accurate perception in top management team. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (5): 1360-1378.

Wang, P. & Chan, P.S. 1995. Top management perception of strategic processing in a turbulent environment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 16 (7): 33-43.

Wooldridge, B. & Floyd, S.W. 1990. The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal. 11: 231-241




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/indikator.v6i2.15188

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Indikator: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis

INDIKATOR
Magister Manajemen Universitas Mercu Buana
Jl. Raya Kranggan No. 6 Jatisampurna, Kampus D Universitas Mercu Buana 17436
Tlp./Fax: +62218449635
p-ISSN: 2598-6783
e-ISSN: 2598-4888
http://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/indikator

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats