Moderating Impact of Strategic Vision To The Relationship of Strategic Involvement With Environmental Uncertainty, Competitive Strength, Job Involvement, and Organizational Commitment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/indikator.v6i2.15188Keywords:
Strategic Vision, Strategic Involvement, Environment Uncertainty, Competitive Strength, Job Involvement, Organizational Commitment.Abstract
This research aims to understand the moderating impact of strategic vision to the relationship of strategic involvement with environment uncertainty, competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment. The sample of this research are 72 officials of Muhammadiyah universities in Indonesia which are called Rector, Chief, Director, Vice of Rector, Vice of Chief, Vice of Director, and Dean.
This research use survey method with questionnaire as research instrument and nonprobability sampling method, specifically purposive sampling in particular. To test the validity we use confirmatory factor analysis and to test reliability we use coefficient of cronbach’s alpha. To test the hypotheses we use moderated regression analysis.
The result of this research shows that strategic involvement is positively related and significant to environment uncertainty, competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Strategic vision does not moderate the relationship of strategic involvement with environment uncertainty, but it moderates the relationship of strategic involvement with competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment.
References
Bourgoeouis, lll, L.J. 1985. Strategic goal, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environment. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (3): 548-573.
Conger, J.A. 1989. The Charismatic Leader: Beyond The Mystique of Exceptional Leadership, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dubin, R. 1956. Industrial worker’s world: a study of central life interests of industrial workers, Social Problem, dalam Blau,G.J. 1985. A multiple study investigation of the dimensionality of job involvement. Journal of Vicational Behavior, 9: 19-36.
Gordon.L.A & Narayanan, V.K. 1984. Management accounting systems, perceived environment uncertainty, and organizational structure: an empirical investigation. Accounting Organization & Social, 9 (1): 33-47.
Hair, J.F. Jr., R.E. Anderson, R.L.Atham, & W.C. Black 1998. Multivariate data Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice hall,Inc.
Huselid,M.A & Day,N.E. 1991. Organizational commitment, job involvement, and turnover: a substantive and methodological analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 380-391.
Ireland,R.D., Hitt, M.A., & de Porras, D.A. 1987. Strategy formulation process differences in perception of strength and weaknesses indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 459-485.
Kanungo,R.N. 1982. Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 341-349.
Kelly,D. 2000. Using vision to improve organizational communication. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21 (2): 92-101.
Larwood,L., Falbe, C.M., Kringer, M.P, & Miesing, P. 1995. Structure and meaning of organizational vision. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3): 740-769.
Nanus,B. 1992. Visionary Leadership: Creating A Compelling Sense of Direction For Your Organization. san Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Oswald,S.L., Mossholder, K.W. & Harris, S.G. 1994. Vision salience and strategic involvement: implication for psychological attachment to organizational and job. Strategic management Journal, 15: 477-489.
Oswald,S.L., Mossholder, K.W. & Harris, S.G. 1997. Relations between strategic involvement and manager’s perception’s of environment and competitive strengths. Group & Organization management, 22 (3): 343-365.
Parnell, J.A., Lester, D.L., & Menefee M.L. 2000. Strategy as response to organizational uncertainty: an alternative perspective on the strategy-performance relationship. Management Decision, 38 (8): 520-530.
Porter, M. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques For Analyzing Industries and Competitor, New York: Free Press.
Sekaran,U. 2003. Research Methods For Business, 4 ed, New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Strickland,A.J. & Thompson,A.A. 2003. Strategic Management: Concept and Cases, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int.Inc.
Sutcliffe, A.M. 1994. What executive notice: accurate perception in top management team. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (5): 1360-1378.
Wang, P. & Chan, P.S. 1995. Top management perception of strategic processing in a turbulent environment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 16 (7): 33-43.
Wooldridge, B. & Floyd, S.W. 1990. The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal. 11: 231-241
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
This work is also licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
