Concept and Prototype Design Differentiation Strategy Application (Case Study on Restaurants at Medan Plaza Fair, Medan City)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/jimb.v8i2.14685Keywords:
Concept design, prototype, design thinkin, differentiation strategyAbstract
The study aims to design application concepts and prototypes of differentiation strategies in achieving competitive advantage in restaurants using a design thinking model (a case study on a restaurant at Medan Plaza Fair Medan City), related to the problem of restaurants that must be able to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic situation amid of a highly competitive environment. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach and used purposive random sampling for sampling. The type of data used is primary and secondary data with data collection through interviews, observation and documentation. Data analysis uses value chain analysis, and design thinking models. The results showed that the conceptual design in building the application of a differentiation strategy to achieve competitive advantage in restaurants consisted of four data pillars, namely (i)identification, (ii) analysis of potential sources of differentiation, (iii)creating differentiation, and (iv)restaurant value chains.The prototype built on the application of a restaurant's differentiation strategy consists of five differentiations, namely: (i)product differentiation, (ii)service differentiation, (iii)place differentiation, (iv)personnel differentiation, and (v)channel differentiation.This research is expected to be able to build an application of competitive strategy through an effective differentiation strategy, making it easier for restaurant business people to develop and define differentiation strategies in achieving competitive advantage and provide opportunities for restaurant businesses to always innovate in strategies that are adaptive to any changes in the dynamic and complex environment.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A., & Sayed, K. (2020). Development of competency‐based training system in Assiut‐ITEC: A case study. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 5(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1217
Asmarantaka,R. W., J. Atmakusuma, Y. N. Muflikh, dan N. Rosiana. 2017. Konsep Pemasaran Agribisnis: Pendekatan Ekonomi dan Manajemen. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, Vol. 5(2): 143-164. http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jagbi/article/view/22140/14788. [1 Maret 2021].
Assauri, Sofjan. (2011). Strategic Management, Sustainable Competitive Advantages. Lembaga Management Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Christopher, M. 2005. Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating Value Adding Networks 3rd Edition. Pearson Education Limited. Harlow.
Da Silva, R. H., Kaminski, P. C., & Armellini, F. (2020). Improving new product development innovation effectiveness by using problem solving tools during the conceptual development phase: Integrating Design Thinking and TRIZ. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(4), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12399
Danso, A., Adomako, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Owusu-Agyei, S., & Konadu, R. (2019). Environmental sustainability orientation, competitive strategy and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2291
David, R Fred. (2012).Strategic Management Concepts & Cases. Pearson Academic: 14th edition.
Dell’Era, C., Magistretti, S., Cautela, C., Verganti, R., & Zurlo, F. (2020). Four kinds of design thinking: From ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(2), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12353
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, P. D. dan P. M. (2019). Progres sinkronisasi SMK Kota Medan. Dapodik Kemendikbud. dapo.kemendikbud.go.id
Editors, S., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (n.d.). Series Editors.
Gao, Y., & Hafsi, T. (2019). Does charitable giving substitute or complement firm differentiation strategy? Evidence from Chinese private SMEs. European Management Review, 16(3), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12180
Handarkho, Y. D., Suryanto, T. R., Kartika, F., Dewi, S., Julianto, E., Studi, P., Informatika, T., Industri, F. T., Atma, U., & Yogyakarta, J. (2017). Penerapan Strategi E-business Untuk Meningkatkan Keunggulan Kompetitif dari Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah di Indonesia ( Studi kasus Trooper Electronic Yogyakarta ). 201–212.
Holager, J., Innovation, S., & April, D. (2019). A short introduction to Design Thinking. April.
Indahsari, C. L., & Sukoco, I. (2020). Konsep Aplikasi Masak Yuk! dengan Menggunakan Prinsip Design Thinking. Organum: Jurnal Saintifik Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 3(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.35138/organum.v3i1.70
Kuswantoro, A. (2015). Model Elektronik Arsip (E Arsip) Pembelajaran berbasis Virtual dan Microsoft Access pada SMK Program Keahlian Administrasi Perkantoran. Administrasi, Kajian Ilmu, XIII.
Lages, L. F., Ricard, A., Hemonnet-Goujot, A., & Guerin, A. M. (2020). Frameworks for innovation, collaboration, and change: Value creation wheel, design thinking, creative problem-solving, and lean. Strategic Change, 29(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2321
Lazuardi, M. L., & Sukoco, I. (2019). Design Thinking David Kelley & Tim Brown: Otak Dibalik Penciptaan Aplikasi Gojek. Organum: Jurnal Saintifik Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35138/organum.v2i1.51
Lee, H., & Park, J. E. (2021). Designing a New Empathy- Oriented Prototyping Toolkit for the Design Thinking Process : Creativity and Design Sensibility. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12345
Matthews, J., & Wrigley, C. (2017). Design and Design Thinking in Business and Management Higher Education. 10(1), 41–54.
Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2016). Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(3), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12211
Muhyadi. (2009). Aplikasi Konsep Sistem Dalam Pengelolaan Sekolah. Efisiensi, Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, ix.
Nafiah, D. (2011). Aplikasi Total Quality Management (TQM) dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi. Efisiensi, Kajian Ilmu AAdministrasi.
Pearce, John A. Dan Robinson, Richard B. 2007. Manajemen Strategis: Formulasi Implementasi, dan Pengendalian Edisi 10 Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Pembinaan, D., Menengah, S., Jenderal, D., Pendidikan, M., Dan, D., & Nasional, D. P. (2018). P e r a n S M K d a l a m M e n d u k u n g P e r t u m b u h a n E k o n o m i D a e r a h :
Pendidikan. (2018). ingin bersaing dan banyak murid, sekolah swasta harus lakukan ini. Jawa Pos.
Pendidikan, D. (2020). 13 pengertian aplikasi menurut para ahli. Dosen Pendidikan.
Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage : Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance : with a new introduction. The Free Press. New York, USA
Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage. In The Free Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.001%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.055%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.006%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127252%0Ahttp://dx.doi.o
Renesia. (2020). pilih SMK negeri atau smk swasta? berikut rekomendasinya buat kami. Renesia.
Seftiawan, D. (2019). pertumbuhan jumlah smk tak sebanding dengan peningkatan kualitas. Pikiran Rakyat.
Shelly, L. (2019). SMK swasta dengan jumlah siswa sedikit, Direktur Dikdasmen: Tutup atau jadikan lembaga saja. Malangvoice.
Su, Z., Guo, H., & Sun, W. (2017). Exploration and Firm Performance: The Moderating Impact of Competitive Strategy. British Journal of Management, 28(3), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12218
Sutirman. (2003). Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi dalam Pendidikan. Administrasi, Kajian Ilmu.
Widarma, A., & Kumala, H. (2018). Perancangan Aplikasi Gaji Karyawan Pada Pt. Pp London Sumatra Indonesia Tbk. Gunung Malayu Estate - Kabupaten Asahan. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.36294/jurti.v1i2.303
Wisdaningrum, Oktavima. 2013. Analisis Rantai Nilai (Value Chain) dalam Lingkungan Internal Perusahaan. Jurnal Vol 1, No 1. Banyuwangi: FE Univertsitas 17 Agustus 1945
Wuertz, H., Eshbaugh, S., & Nelson, S. B. (2020). Design Thinking For Organizational Change. Design Management Review, 31(4), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/drev.12246
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of this article was transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana if and when the article was accepted for publication. The undersigned below transfers all and all rights in and to paper including without limitation all copyright to UMB. The undersigned states and guarantees that the paper is genuine and that he is the author of the paper, except material that is clearly identified as the original source, with the notification of the permission of the copyright owner if necessary and has the power and authority to make and carry out this assignment. We state that this paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
Furthermore, I / We hereby transfer unlimited publicity rights to the above mentioned papers as a whole to Universitas Mercu Buana. Copyright transfers include the right to reproduce and distribute articles, including reprints, translations, photo reproductions, microforms, electronic forms (offline, online) or other reproductions that have similar properties. The appropriate author signs and accepts the responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of each and all co-authors. This agreement must be signed by at least one of the authors who has obtained approval from the co-author (s) where applicable.
After the submission of this agreement is signed by the appropriate author, changes in authorship or in the order of the registered author will not be accepted. Retained Rights / Provisions and Conditions Although the author is permitted to reuse all or part of the Work in another work, this does not include giving a third party request for reprinting, republishing, or any other type of reuse.
