Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Maturitas Enterprise Risk Management (Erm) Kontraktor Besar Di Indonesia
Keywords:
Enterprise Risk Management, konstruksi, kontraktor, ISO, IndonesiaAbstract
Sebesar 85 persen nilai pasar konstruksi dikuasai oleh kontraktor besar yang hanya 5 persen dari total 160.000 badan usaha. Tingginya nilai pasar konstruksi yang dikuasai oleh kontraktor besar tersebut identik dengan banyaknya kegiatan, tingginya tingkat kesulitan, dan berbagai ketidakpastian. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) adalah salah satu pendekatan holistik dalam mengidentifikasi risiko perusahaan yang mungkin dihadapi dan menentukan respon yang tepat sesuai dengan risk appetite perusahaan. Standar Nasional
Indonesia (SNI) ISO 31000:2011 tentang manajemen risiko, merupakan panduan yang resmi dalam proses pelaksanaan manajemen risiko. Selain itu, beberapa perusahaan kontraktor juga menerapkan sistem manajemen mutu dengan baik yang ditandai dengan sertifikasi ISO 9001. Penelitian ini bertujuan mencari faktor-fakor yang mempengaruhi maturitas ERM kontraktor besar di Indonesia berdasarkan implementasi ISO 31000:2011, sertifikasi ISO 9001, klasifikasi perusahaan, dan pengalaman perusahaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara perusahaan yang mengadopsi kerangka manajemen risiko ISO 31000:2011 dengan perusahaan yang tidak mengadopsi kerangka manajemen risiko ISO 31000:2011. Perusahaan yang mengadopsi kerangka manajemen risiko ISO 31000:2011 memiliki tingkat kematangan manajemen risiko yang lebih baik daripada perusahaan yang tidak mengadopsi kerangka manajemen risiko ISO
31000:2011. Faktor pengalaman perusahaan juga menentukan tingkat maturitas ERM perusahaan. Perusahaan dengan pengalaman lebih banyak terbukti memiliki tingkat maturitas ERM yang lebih matang.
Downloads
References
. Andrianto, Hadrian (2015), “Kajian Penerapan ISO 9001:2008 Pada Perusahaan Kontraktor yang Memiliki Proyek di Bandung”, Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. Bandung
. Chou SY, Chang YH (2008) A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy aligned fuzzy SMART approach. Expert Syst Appl 34(4):2241–2253
. Ciorciari M, Blattner P (2008) Enterprise risk management maturity-level assessment tool. 2008 enterprise risk management symposium, Chicago, 14–16 April
. Cox A. and Townsend M., 1998, Strategic procurement in construction: towards better practice in the management of construction supply chains, Tomas Telford, UK.
. CRMS Indonesia. (2013),”Lahirnya SNI ISO 31000”, (Online),
(http://crmsindonesia.org/knowledge/la hirnya-standar-nasional-indonesiauntuk- manajemen-risiko-sni-iso-31000 diakses 30 November 2016).
. Fadun, Olajide Solomon. (2013). Risk management and Risk Management Failure: Lesson for Business Enterprises. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. February 2013, Vol 3, No. 2. ISSN:2222-6990.
. Gordon, L.A., Loeb, M.P. and Tseng, C.Y. (2009),“Enterprise risk management and firm performance: a contingency perspective”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 301-327.
. Hillson, D.A. (1997),”Toward a risk maturity model” International Journal of Project & Bussiness Risk Management, Vol. 1, No. 1, 35-45.
. (https://isoindonesiacenter.com/risk-basedthinking-dalam-iso-90012015/ diakses 30 November 2016)
. ISOCENTER INDONESIA. (2016), “Risk Based Thinking dalam ISO 9001:2015”, (Online),
. Korbel, A. dan Benedict, R. (2007). “Application of the project
management maturity model to drive organisational improvement in a state owned corporation”, Australian Institute of Project Management
National Conference 2007, Hobart, Tasmania, October 7 – 10.
. Kurniawan,Andreas (2016), “Mengukur Tingkat Maturitas Enterprise Risk Managment (ERM) Kontraktor Besar di Indonesia”, Proceeding of
Konferensi Nasional Pascasarjana Teknik Sipil (KNPTS), Bandung, 8
November
. Lembaga Pengembangan Jasa Konstruksi Nasional (2013), “Peraturan Lembaga Pengembangan Jasa Konstruksi Nasional Nomor: 10 Tahun 2013 Tentang Registrasi Usaha Jasa Pelaksana Konstruksi”.
. Negnevitsky M (2006) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Limited, New York
. Rahman, M R (2015),”Gapensi: Pasar Konstruksi Nasional Dikuasai Kontraktor Besar”, (online), http://sumbar.antaranews.com//berita/145639/gapensi-pasar-konstruksinasional-dikuasai-kontraktorbesar.html, diakses 1 september 2016)
. Riadi (2015), “Penilaian maturitas penerapan manajemen risiko berdasarkan ISO 31000 : studi kasus di PT XYZ = risk management maturity assessment based on ISO 31000 : a case study in PT XYZ”, Program Studi Manajemen Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. Bandung
. Ross TJ (2010) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications (3rd ed). Wiley, New York
. Schaufelberger, J. (2009).Construction business management, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
. Taufik, Januar. (2015), “Model Asesmen Maturitas Manajemen Risiko Untuk Organisasi Pengguna Jasa Konstruksi Pemerintah”. Program Pascasarjana Teknik Sipil. Konsentrasi Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. Bandung.
. Wijaya, Deo Fani Nur. (2013). “Hubungan Antara Level Kedewasaan Manajemen Risiko, Kompleksitas Proyek, Dan Kinerja Perusahaan ditinjau Dan Perspektif kontinjensi”. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana Teknik Industri. Jurusan Teknik Mesin Dan Industri. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Gajah Mada Yogyakarta
. Zhao, X., Hwang, B. G., and Low, S. P. (2013). “Enterprise Risk Management in International Construction Operations”. Springer Singapore
. Zou, P.X.W., Chen, Y., dan Chan, T.Y. (2010),”Understanding & inproving your risk management capability: assessment model for construction organizations”, Journal of Construction Engineering &
Management, ASCE/August 2010, Vol 136 (8), 854-863.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
This work is also licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
