Comparison of Real Response Modification Factors and Performance of SMRFS Structure with OMRFS Structure Using Pushover Method

Friska Damayanti, Resmi Bestari Muin

Abstract


The value of the earthquake response modification factor ( ) affects the results of the story drift in the SMRSF structure, where the smaller the -value, the larger the deviation and the need for longitudinal reinforcement will be more and more. For structures that do not comply with the SMRSF provisions, in some locations the need for reinforcement is less than that of structures that use the SMRSF provisions. The performance of a structure can be analyzed using the pushover method. The research was conducted with a 4-story and 8-story configuration, with soft soil and medium soil conditions and using SMRSF and OMRSF. From research analysis results, the cross-sectional dimensions of the columns and beams of the ordinary moment building structure system with soft soil type are the largest cross-sectional dimensions compared to the others. Under the provisions of ATC-40, the structure is included in the Damage Control (DC) category level, which means the building is still able to withstand the force of the earthquake, and the risk of fatalities humans are very small. The real -value of the structure with SMRSF is not much different from the  in the provisions of SNI 1726:2019.

Keywords


Response Modification Value; SMRFS; OMRFS; Structural Performance; Pushover Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arif, F., & Pariatmono, P. 2022. Simulasi Numerik Penggunaan Base Isolation Untuk Struktur Sederhana Tahan Gempa. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(3), 1163-1174.

ATC-40. 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building, vol. 1. Redwood City (USA): Applied Technology Council.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2019. SNI 1726-2019. Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2019. SNI 2847-2019. Persyaratan Beton Struktural Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. 2020. SNI 1727-2020. Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Bullen, K. A., & Bolt, B. A. 1985. An introduction to the theory of seismology. Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.11 19/1.1971106

CSI (Computers and Structures Incorporated). 2020. ETABS Ultimate, 64-bit, Versi 18.1.1. [Software]. Barkeley, California, Amerika Serikat. www.csiamerica.com

Dewobroto, W. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Baja Tahan Gempa dengan Analisa Pushover. In Civil Engineering National Conference: Sustainability Construction & Structural Engineering Based on Professionalism – Unika Soegijapranata, Semarang (pp. 17-18). Juni. Online access: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=IojiJacAAAAJ&citation_for_view=IojiJacAAAAJ:d1gkVwhDpl0C

FEMA-440. 2005. ‘Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures’, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.

Geraldi, R., Christianto, D., & Pranata, H. 2019. Evaluasi Struktur Gedung Dengan Sistem Rangka Beton Pemikul Momen Khusus Berbasis Kinerja. JMTS: Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 2(2), 115-124. https://doi.org /10.24912/jmts.v2i2.4300

Hasan, R., Xu, L., & Grierson, D. E. 2002. Pushover analysis for performance-based seismic design. Computers & structures, 80(31), 2483-2493. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0045-7949(02)00212-2

Mangoda, N. Z., Sultan, M. A., & Imran, I. 2019. Evaluasi Kinerja Gedung Beton Bertulang Dengan Metode Pushover (Studi Kasus Bangunan Gedung di Ternate). Jurnal Sipil Sains, 9(17). http://dx.doi.org/10.333 87/sipilsains.v9i17.952

Marwanto, Ary, Agus Setiya Budi, and Agus Supriyadi. 2014. ‘Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung 10 Lantai Dengan Analisis Pushover Terhadap Drift dan Displacement Menggunakan Software Etabs’, Jurnal Teknik Sipil, September, 484–91. https://doi.org/10.20961/mateksi.v2i3.37419

Miranda, Eduardo, and Vitelmo V. Bertero. 1994. ‘Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design’, Earthquake Spectra, 357–79 https://doi.org /10.1193/1.1585778

Mondal, Apurba, Siddhartha Ghosh, dan G. R. Reddy. 2013. ‘Performance-Based Evaluation of the Response Reduction Factor for Ductile RC Frames’, Engineering Structures, 56, 1808–19 https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.038

Muin, R.B. 2010. ‘Nonlinear Response of Soil Structure Interaction due to Cyclic Loading’. The First International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment, 1, 149-156 https://icsbe.uii.ac.id/4th-2016/01/ downloads/archive/2010/ICSBE_2010_Proceedings.pdf

Muin, R.B., & Hidayat, R. 2019. Efek Penggunaan Balok Tidur Terhadap Perilaku Seismik Struktur Gedung Beton Bertulang Berlantai Banyak. https://doi.org/10.22219/ jmts.v17i2.9863

Priyosulistyo, H. 2020. Struktur Beton Bertulang. Gajah Mada University Press: Yogyakarta. Online access: https://ugmpress .ugm.ac.id/userfiles/product/daftar_isi/Perancangan_dan_Analisis_Struktur_Beton_Bertulang_1.pdf

Riantoby, I. K., Budi, A. S., & Purwanto, E. 2014. Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Pada Gedung Bertingkat dengan Analisis Pushover menggunakan Software Etabs (Studi Kasus: Hotel di Wilayah Karanganyar). Matriks Teknik Sipil, 2(1), 116. Online accsess: http://kin.perpusnas. go.id/DisplayData.aspx?pId=186064&pRegionCode=UN11MAR&pClientId=112

Structurepoint. 2017. SP Column Versi 6.0. Investigates columns, shear walls, bridge piers in buildings. Skokie, IL, Amerika Serikat. https://www.structurepoint.org/

Tangahu, B. R., Nur, K. S., & Gani, M. 2019. Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Modifikasi Respon SRPMK Struktur Gedung Beton Bertulang Pada Balok Kategori Desain Seismik D. Jurnal Teknik, 17(1), 57-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.006

Tarbali, K., & Shakeri, K. 2014. Story shear and torsional moment-based pushover procedure for asymmetric-plan buildings using an adaptive capacity spectrum method. Engineering Structures, 79, 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.006

Wardhani, A. S. K., Priyono, P., & Manggala, A. S. 2018. Evaluasi Kapasitas Struktur Gedung Meotel By Dafam Jember Dengan Metode Pushover Analysis. Jurnal Rekayasa Infrastruktur Hexagon, 3(2). https://doi.org /10.32528/hgn.v3i2.2911

Whittaker, A., Hart, G., & Rojahn, C. 1999. Seismic response modification factors. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(4), 438-444. https://doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)07 33-9445(1999)125:4(438)

Yurizka, Hanan, and Anis Rosyidah. 2020. ‘The Performance of Irregular Building Structures Using Pushover Analysis’, Logic: Jurnal Rancang Bangun dan Teknologi. 20.2. 65–72 https://doi.org/10.31940/logic. v20i2.1456




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/jrs.2023.v12.i1.04

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Rekayasa Sipil

JURNAL REKAYASA SIPIL
Fakultas Teknik Universitas Mercu Buana
Jl. Raya Meruya Selatan, Kembangan, Jakarta 11650
Tlp./Fax: +62215871335
p-ISSN: 2252-7699
e-ISSN: 2598-5051
http://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/JRS

email: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter
View My Stats

.