Integration of balanced scorecard and analytical hierarchy process to measure the performance of supporting unit in aircraft maintenance service companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2024.v16.i1.0103Keywords:
balanced scorecard, analytical hierarchy process, performance measurement, service industryAbstract
Dynamic and challenging business environment in the aircraft maintenance services industry require company to survive and ensure business continuity. To realize effective performance, performance measurement is needed as a management system for managing and controlling performance. The purpose of this research is to measure the performance of supporting unit at PT. XYZ by using balanced scorecard framework that is integrated with AHP. The steps in this research includes identification strategy objective, identification key performance indicator (KPI), design and measure performance using integrated balanced scorecard and AHP. The method used in this study combines quantitative data with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. The AHP method is used for KPI weighting. The design of KPI weights for each perspective in balanced scorecard are 42,3 % for the learning and growth, 33,5% for internal business process, 17,3% for financial, and 6,8% for the customer perspective. The results of supporting unit performance show the lowest score in the learning and growth perspective with average performance indicator, while in internal business process, financial and customer perspective have good performance indicator. The result of measuring total performance of four perspective are 74,5% which indicates that the performance of PT.XYZ’s BSC is in the good enough category.
Downloads
References
Gong, Y., Ying, W., Yu, Y., Zhou, XZ, & Fan, X. (2021). Research on the Key Performance Evaluation Methods of Enterprises Using BSC and KPI Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process - - Illustrated by the Case of Hangzhou Cigarette Factory. E3S Web of Conferences, 251.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125101067
Megawaty, Aminuddin Hamdat, Makkulawu Panyiwi Kessi, A., & Panus. (2022). Application Of The Balanced Scorecard As A Measurement Model Of The Balance Of Stakeholder Value Proposition. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 3(2), 394–402.https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v3i2.466
Hussain, M., Ajmal, MM, Khan, M., & Saber, H. (2015). Competitive priorities and knowledge management: An empirical investigation of manufacturing companies in the UAE. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(6), 791–806.https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2014-0020
Moradi, N., & Moradi, S. (2021). A method for project performance evaluation by combining the golden triangle project, BSC, AHP, and Topsis. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 8(1), 81–85.https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSOM.2021.1.7
Satybaldiyeva, DO, Mukhanova, GS, Satybaldiyev, OS, Dossova, SN, & Shaldarbekova, KB (2018). Determination of effective balanced indicators in the airline company using a modified fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(8), 2798–2810.https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v9.8(38).29
Yaghoobi, T., & Haddadi, F. (2016). Organizational performance measurement by a framework integrating BSC and AHP. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(7), 959–976.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2015-0001
Andrias, PM, & Vanany, I. (2021). Design and implementation for performance measurement system in the power plant operation and maintenance company. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1072(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1072/1/012007
Canitez, F., Deveci, M., Demirel, N. Ç., & Demirel, TD (2018). Designing a Balanced Scorecard Framework for Public Transport Organizations: The Case of IETT. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 5(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.26352/CJ02F5021
Dekrita, YES, Yunus, R., Citta, AB, & Yamin, M. (2019). Integration of Balanced Scorecard and Analytical Hierarchy Process as a Tool for Determining the Priority of the Program Strategy: Case Study in Dr. Tc. Hillers Maumere Hospital. 92(Icame 2018), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.2991/icame-18.2019.8
Dewayana, TS, & Dani, WS (2016). PT XYZ Supplier Performance Evaluation Model with Analytical Hierarchy Process Method. Technology National Seminar …, November. http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/SNTIKI/article/download/2791/1725
Erlinda Muslim, Rizka Amalia Liputo, & Ghassani Shabrina. (2019). Designing a Total Performance Scorecard By Integrating Personal Balanced Scorecard and Organizational Balanced Scorecard (Case Study: Department of Corporate Development, Maintenance Repair And Overhaul Company). Journal of Industrial Engineering Systems, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.32734/jsti.v21i1.904
Kim, D., Oh, W., Yun, J., Youn, J., Do, S., & Lee, D. (2021). Development of key performance indicators for measuring the management performance of small construction firms in Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116166
Kurnia, I., Mutoharoh, M., & Fithri, P. (2021). Integration of the Balanced Scorecard Method and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) to Measure the Performance of the Faculty of Engineering, Krisnadwipayana University. Journal of Science and Technology: Journal of Science and Industrial Technology Applications, 21(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.36275/stsp.v21i2.390
Maulana, S., Pasaribu, AM, & Septiani, W. (2022). Selection of electric forklift battery suppliers using AHP and TOPSIS methods in the automotive manufacturing industry (Selection of electric forklift battery suppliers using AHP and TOPSIS methods in the automotive manufacturing industry). 14(3), 261–270.
Maulani, B., & Hasibuan, S. (2021). Design of Safety Balanced Scorecard Performance Measurement at the Indonesian Asbestos Company. PASTI Journal, 15(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.22441/pasti.2021.v15i1.004
Mitrea-Curpanaru, GGL (2021). Models for measuring the performance of an organization. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1169(1), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1169/1/012034
Stofkova, J., Krejnus, M., Stofkova, KR, Malega, P., & Binasova, V. (2022). Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811546
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
