Enhancing supplier management strategies: integrating purchasing and supplier potential matrices in furniture manufacturing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2024.v16.i2.107Keywords:
best worst method, purchasing portfolio matrix, strategy, supplier potential matrix, supplier segmentationAbstract
Supplier segmentation is one of the most important supply chain activities for most companies that collaborate with many suppliers such as in furniture manufacturing. Purchasing Portfolio Matrix (PPM) is a segmentation method that considers two dimensions (supply risk and profit impact) which are the basis for classifying materials to be purchased by the company. Supplier Potential Matrix (SPM) is a new supplier segmentation approach that includes two dimensions (capabilities and willingness). These two approaches are important because they have different focuses, namely PPM on suppliers while SPM on relationships. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to classify suppliers using a combination of PPM and SPM and determine the appropriate relationship management strategy. Data collection was carried out in the case of one manufacturing company that works with 74 raw material suppliers. Best Worst Method (BWM) is used to determine the criteria weights in both segmentation approaches. So from the 74 suppliers, the results were 7 suppliers in PPM1, 43 suppliers in PPM2, 5 suppliers in PPM3, and 19 suppliers in PPM4 and different strategies were obtained so that this combined PPM-SPM approach was able to improve supplier management.
Downloads
References
Aditya Nur Rachman, & Nofrisel. (2019). Analysis of Material Project Purchasing Strategy Using Kraljic’s Method. International Conference on Bussiness and Management Research.
Amoako-Gyampah, K., Boakye, K. G., Adaku, E., & Famiyeh, S. (2019). Supplier relationship management and firm performance in developing economies: A moderated mediation analysis of flexibility capability and ownership structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.021
Arantes, A., Alhais, A. F., & Ferreira, L. M. D. F. (2022). Application of a purchasing portfolio model to define medicine purchasing strategies: An empirical study. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101318
Bildsten, L. (2021). A project-based purchasing portfolio matrix applied to the Australian construction industry. SN Business & Economics, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00139-5
Fallah Lajimi, H., Seyed Haeri, S. A., Jafari Sorouni, Z., & Salimi, N. (2021). Supplier selection based on multi-stakeholder Best- Worst Method. Journal of Supply Chain Management Science. https://doi.org/10.18757/jscms.2021.5864
Improta, G., Perrone, A., Russo, M. A., & Triassi, M. (2019). Health technology assessment (HTA) of optoelectronic biosensors for oncology by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Likert scale. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0775-z
Kaya, İ., Çolak, M., & Terzi, F. (2019). A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making. Dalam Energy Strategy Reviews (Vol. 24, hlm. 207–228). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.03.003
Mohammadi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model. Omega (United Kingdom), 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.06.001
Mutinda Kimwaki, B., Karanja Ngugi, P., & Odhiambo, R. (2022). Supplier Relationship Management and Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Kenya. International Journal of Recent Innovations in Academic Research. https://www.ijriar.com/
Putra, A., Tarigan, Z. J. H., & Siagian, H. (2020). Influence of Information Quality on Retailer Satisfaction through Supply Chain Flexibility and Supplier Relationship Management in the Retail Industry. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 22(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.9744/jti.22.2.93-102
Rahayu, S., Ngudi Wiyatno, T., & Romli, I. (t.t.). Segmentasi Supplier Mempertimbangkan Kombinasi Purchasing Portfolio Matrix (PPM)-Supplier Portfolio Matrix (SPM) Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Komponen Otomotif. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 3(2), 59–71.
Rezaei, J., & Fallah Lajimi, H. (2019). Segmenting supplies and suppliers: bringing together the purchasing portfolio matrix and the supplier potential matrix. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2018.1535649
Rivaldi, D., Pulansari, F., dan Kartika, P.A. (2023). Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Baut menggunakan metode AHP-TOPSIS PT Stechoq Robotika Indonesia. Jurnal Teknik Industri. Vol. 18, No.2, hlm. 79-87.
Putri, F. K, dan Pulansari, F. (2022). PVC Supplier Selection with Integration of AHP and TOPSIS Methods. Jurnal Manajemen Industri dan Logistik, Vol. 06, No. 01, hlm. 84-98. Doi: 10.30988/jmil.v6i1.952x
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
