User Requirements Analysis for Government’s Budget Information System Using Kano’s Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/fifo.2025.v17i1.002Keywords:
user requirement, software requirements, government, budget information, Kano’s ModelAbstract
This study finds out what attributes still require attention based on Kano’s Model analysis, which has to be used to prioritize software requirements in the government's or agency’s budget software. This research prioritizes software requirement attributes using Kano's Model. This research used an application by INTRAC as the basis for preparing a questionnaire distributed to 75 civil servants. From this research, it can be concluded that there are 15 sub-elements (including 25 features) classified as one-dimensional and four sub-elements (including eight features) classified as Indifferent. According to the Blauth Formula and continuous data analysis, the result shows a one-dimensional pattern. Based on the CS Coefficient, nine features are prioritized for development (especially the process budget revision). Development on the dimensions of interface requirements and functional requirements has the potential to increase the end user's satisfaction.Downloads
References
N. M. Salleh and P. N. E. Nohuddin, “Optimization of software requirement process: An integrated conceptual model of lean six sigma and requirement planning,” IRASE, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 125–133, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1556/1848.2019.0015.
D. Hallmann, “‘I Don’t Understand!’: Toward a Model to Evaluate the Role of User Story Quality,” in Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, V. Stray, R. Hoda, M. Paasivaara, and P. Kruchten, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 103–112. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-49392-9_7.
E. O. C. Mkpojiogu, N. LailyHashim, and A. Hussain, “Enhancing the Quality of Software Requirements Artifacts with Scoring Rubrics-Assisted Reading Technique,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), vol. 8, no. 8S, pp. 467–474, 2019.
K. Xu, Y. V. Chen, L. Zhang, and L. Rui, “Improving Design Software Based On Fuzzy Kano Model: A Case Study of Virtual Reality Interior Design Software.,” The Design Journal, vol. 22, no. sup1, pp. 1983–1992, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1594923.
Directorate General of Budget, “SISTEM MONITORING DAN EVALUASI KINERJA TERPADU KEMENTERIAN KEUANGAN.” Ministry of Finance, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.anggaran-old.kemenkeu.go.id/dja/edef-konten-view.asp?id=1449
S. Santini et al., “User Requirements Analysis of an Embodied Conversational Agent for Coaching Older Adults to Choose Active and Healthy Ageing Behaviors during the Transition to Retirement: A Cross-National User Centered Design Study,” IJERPH, vol. 18, no. 18, p. 9681, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189681.
M. R. Alfarisi, “Overview: Sekilas Tentang Sakti,” Jakarta, Aug. 31, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://klc2.kemenkeu.go.id/kms/knowledge/overview-sekilas-tentang-sakti-ae981c88/detail/
P. Madzík, P. Budaj, D. Mikuláš, and D. Zimon, “Application of the Kano Model for a Better Understanding of Customer Requirements in Higher Education—A Pilot Study,” Administrative Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 11, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/admsci9010011.
F. Bozyiğit, Ö. Aktaş, and D. Kılınç, “Linking software requirements and conceptual models: A systematic literature review,” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 71–82, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2020.11.006.
Q. Meng and J. Dong, “Future Direction and Visual Analysis of Kano Model: A Literature Review,” JSSM, vol. 11, no. 04, pp. 399–413, 2018, doi: 10.4236/jssm.2018.114028.
V. Anu, W. Hu, J. C. Carver, G. S. Walia, and G. Bradshaw, “Development of a human error taxonomy for software requirements: A systematic literature review,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 103, pp. 112–124, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2018.06.011.
F. Rindani and S. Puspitodjati, “Integration of Webqual Method to Importance Performance Analysis and Kano Model to Analyze System Quality of E-Government: Case Study LAPOR!,” J. Sistem Inf. (J. Inf. Sys.), vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–17, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.21609/jsi.v16i2.937.
T. Choedon and Y.-C. Lee, “Classification and Evaluation of Service Requirements in Mobile Tourism Application Using Kano Model and AHP,” The Journal of Information Systems, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 43–65, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.5859/KAIS.2018.27.1.43.
S. Shahidi, “Comparing the effectiveness of conventional and Kano model questionnaire for gathering requirement of online bus reservation system,” ijirss, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–32, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.53894/ijirss.v3i1.30.
R. A. S. Putra and Priyanto, “Kano Model Analysis of Android Apps Quality from End User’s Preferences,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1737, no. 1, p. 012016, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1737/1/012016.
K. A. Kamaruddin and N. A. Roslan, “Using Kano Model to Prioritize Requirements for UiTM Share Ride Mobile Application Development,” IJEAT, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1752–1757, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijeat.A2653.109119.
M.-T. Lu, H.-P. Lu, and C.-S. Chen, “Exploring the Key Priority Development Projects of Smart Transportation for Sustainability: Using Kano Model,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 15, p. 9319, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14159319.
C. Rawis, S. D. S. Karouw, and S. R. U. A. Sompie, “Software Requirement Specification Academic Information System of Sam Ratulangi University,” Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 107–118, 2021.
D. Januarita and W. A. Prabowo, “Software Requirement Specification Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Makan Berdasarkan ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148-2018,” SISFOKOM, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 215–221, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v9i2.872.
Y. Qu, M. Xinguo, S. Qiu, Z. Liu, X. Zhang, and Z. Hou, “Integrating fuzzy Kano model and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate requirements of smart manufacturing systems,” Concurrent Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 201–212, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1063293X19845137.
U. Ahmed, Amjad Farooq, and Tayyaba Farhat, “ReqSpecOnto: Investigating Explicit Software Requirements Specification,” ICR, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–70, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.32350/icr.0102.03.
J. C. Pereira and R. de F. S. M. Russo, “Design Thinking Integrated in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 138, pp. 775–782, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.101.
D. Lupita Sari and C. Niswatin, “Functional Requirement on Proofreading System,” JSW, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 192–199, May 2019, doi: 10.17706/jsw.14.5.192-199.
A. Hussain, E. O. C. Mkpojiogu, and M. Kutar, “The Impact of Software Features’ Perceived Importance on the Perceived Performance of Software Products’ Quality Elements,” j comput theor nanosci, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2135–2140, May 2019, doi: 10.1166/jctn.2019.7863.
S. Albuga and Y. Odeh, “Towards Prioritizing Software Business Requirements in Startups,” in 2018 8th International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (CSIT), Amman: IEEE, Jul. 2018, pp. 257–265. doi: 10.1109/CSIT.2018.8486216.
Y. He and J. Zhong, Improve Requirement Prioritization By End-user Demands : Model Building and Evaluation. 2021. Accessed: Nov. 19, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-22254
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that this paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above-mentioned paper as a whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
Our Articles are licensed under CC BY-NC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
