Selection of the best public fuel filling stations with analytical hierarchy process in Tangerang Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2025.v17.i1.138Keywords:
AHP, gas station, best gas station, gas station selection, decision supportAbstract
Energy is one of the main factors in supporting mobility in activities. Gas Stations (SPBU) are one way that people can get energy. In its operations, gas stations must be able to provide the best service to consumers so that maintaining consumer loyalty. This study aims to be able to choose the best Gas Stations (SPBU) with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The criteria used are based on previous research and based on the results of expert analysis so that the selected criteria are used as a model in decision making, namely management, sales, services, facilities and variations of fuel products. For alternatives to be evaluated are 5 gas stations located in the Legok area, Tangerang, Banten. Based on the calculation of the pairwise criterion comparison matrix in the AHP method, eigenvalues are obtained to perform consistency tests. after processing and analysis, it is known that the highest criterion is service and the lowest is sales. And alternative calculation results obtained that the gas station 5 is the best alternative chosen.
Downloads
References
Agung N. Pramudhita, Hadi Suyono, & Erni YudaningtyasS. (2015). Penggunaan Algoritma Multi Criteria Decision Making dengan Metode Topsis dalam Penempatan Karyawan Karyawan. Jurnal EECCIS, 9.
Astuti, P., & Amran, T. G. (2011). Pemilihan Alternatif Pengelolaan Sampah Dengan Metode ANP dan BOCR Di Dinas Kebersihan Propinsi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal TI Undip, VI(2), 87–94.
Barrios, M. A. O., De Felice, F., Negrete, K. P., Romero, B. A., Arenas, A. Y., & Petrillo, A. (2016). An AHP-topsis integrated model for selecting the most appropriate tomography equipment. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 15(4), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962201640006X
Chi, H. T. X., & Trinh, D. H. N. (2016). Supplier selection by Using AHP-TOPSIS and Goal Programming-A case Study in Casumina Rubber Company-Vietnam. MATEC Web of Conferences, 68, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166806002
Dias Aziz Pramudita, R. C. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penilaian Rumah Sakit Terbaik Di Lampung Tengah Menggunakan Metode AHP. Jurnal Data Mining Dan Sistem Informasi, 1(2), 10–18.
Doaly, C. O., Moengin, P., & Chandiawan, G. (2019). Pemilihan Multi-Kriteria Pemasok Department Store Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Ahp Dan Topsis. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 7(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.24912/jitiuntar.v7i1.5037
Eka Martyani, S. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Tempat Nongkrong dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. JOURNAL V-TECH (VISION TECHNOLOGY), 2(1).
Peraturan Menteri Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 Tentang Kegiatan Penyaluran Bahan Bakar Minyak, Bahan Bakar Gas Dan Liquefled Petroleum Gas, Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral (2018).
Konstantinos, I., Georgios, T., & Garyfalos, A. (2019). A Decision Support System methodology for selecting wind farm installation locations using AHP and TOPSIS: Case study in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region, Greece. Energy Policy, 132(January 2019), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.020
Marlina, W. Y. (2021). Perangkingan Rekomendasi Supplier Terbaik menggunakan Metode AHP dan Promethee. Jurnal Teknik Komputer AMIK BSI, 7(1).
Maulana, S., Pasaribu, A. M., & Septiani, W. (2022). Pemilihan Pemasok Baterai Forklift Elektrik dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS di Industri Manufaktur Otomotif. Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering, 14(3), 262. https://doi.org/10.22441/oe.2022.v14.i3.060
Moengin, P., & Adisuwiryo, S. (2017). Pemilihan Supplier Bahan Baku Dalam Rangka Mengintegrasikan Sistem Persediaan Dan Produksi. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 7(2), 62–75.
Pelorus, & Karahalios, H. (2017). The application of the AHP-TOPSIS for evaluating ballast water treatment systems by ship operators. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.001
Rađenović, Ž., & Veselinović, I. (2017). Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Method for the Assessment of Health Management Information Systems Efficiency. Economic Themes, 55(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2017-0008
Rahardjo, J., Stok, R. E., & Yustina, R. (2000). Penerapan Multi-Criteria Decision Making Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Sistem Perawatan. Jurusan Teknik Industri, 2(1). http://puslit.petra.ac.id/journals/industrial
Rosiska, E. (2018). Penerapan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Menentukan Mitra Usaha Berprestasi. Resti (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 2(2), 479 – 485.
Santika, G. D., Bukhori, S., Bayhaqqi, & Santoso, D. R. (2021). Decision Support System for Temporary Shelter Selection Using Hybrid AHP and TOPSIS. 2021 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering, ICOMITEE 2021, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOMITEE53461.2021.9650331
Sri Ipnuwati, Khusnul Khotimah, & Sari, K. P. (2018). Pemilihan Cafe Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Jurnal Management Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi, 08, 1–14.
Widjaja Djohan, Suryadi Winata, A. K. (2018). Pemeringkatan Faktor-Faktor Keberhasilan Penerapan Teknologi Informasi Pada Tahap Operasional Dengan Analytical Hierarchy Process. ECo-Buss, 1(1).
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
