KOMPARASI KECUKUPAN INFRASTRUKTUR DI KORIDOR JAWA
Keywords:
infrastruktur, penilaian, peringkat, Jawa, IndonesiaAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai kecukupan infrastruktur koridor Jawa. Penelitian ini melibatkan lebih dari 179 insinyur sipil yang bekerja di berbagai latar belakang profesi sebagai peserta dan merilis nilai baru untuk berbagai infrastruktur di Koridor Jawa, termasuk jalan-jalan regional dan jembatan, transit, kereta api, sistem air bersih, energi, pariwisata, bendungan dan irigasi, dan fasilitas penting lainnya. Penelitian ini mengadopsi pada ASCE dan infrastruktur Australia metodologi rapor. Propinsi yang dipilih dalam penelitian ini adalah: Banten, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Jawa Barat, Jawa Tengah, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, dan Jawa Timur. Teridentifikasi dari studi ini peringkat rata-rata infrastruktur koridor Jawa adalah "D+". Peringkat D+ berarti bahwa infrastruktur dalam sistem atau jaringan kurang memadai; itu menunjukkan tanda-tanda kerusakan atau berfungsi namun tidak terlayaninya kebutuhan pengguna dan memerlukan perhatian khusus sesuai dengan kebutuhan infrastruktur jangka panjang. Beberapa elemen menunjukkan kekurangan yang signifikan dalam kondisi dan fungsi, dengan meningkatnya kerentanan terhadap risiko. Studi ini memberikan banyak informasi tentang dampak infrastruktur yang tidak memadai, dan juga berfokus pada cara-cara pemerintah propinsi di koridor Jawa dapat mulai menangani ini kekurangan kritis.Downloads
References
ARCADIS (2016) Third Global Infrastructure Investment Index, 2016. Wolrd Economic Forum, www.arcadis.com
ASCE (2015) ASCE Infrastructure Report Card 2015. www.infrastructurereportcard
ASCE, (2012) Infrastructure Report Card 2012 for the Colorado, Springs Area, Colorado
Australia Engineers (2010) Report card 2010 Infrastucture Australia, Transport Energy Water Telecommunications, www.engineersaustralia.org.au/irc
Grigg, N., (1988).,Infrastructure Engineering and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Hudson, W.R., Haas,R., dan Uddin, W., (1997) Infrastructure Management, McGraw-Hill.
Kaming, P.F., dan Raharjo, F., (2015) Perceptions of Civil Engineers Regarding Adequacy of Infrastructure in Yogyakarta Special Region, PROCIDIA, International Conference SCESCM, UGM.
Kaming, P.F., dan Raharjo, F., (2016) Komparasi Kecukupan Infrastruktur di Koridor Jawa, Laporan Peneitian, LPPM, UAJY.
Kaming, P.F., dan Raharjo, F., (2016) Perceptions of Civil Engineers on Adequacy of Infrastructure at Sumatera, Proceeding SICEST, Bangka Belitung.
Kaming, P.F., dan Raharjo, F., (2016) Persepsi Insinyur Teknik Sipil tentang Kelayakan Infrastruktur di Koridor Kalimantan, Laporan Penelitian, LPPM, UAJY.
Kaming, P.F., Raharjo, F., dan Pitoyo (2015) Pesepsi Insinyur Teknik Sipil tentang Kelayakan Infrastruktur di Provinsi Jambi, Koridor Sumatera, Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil ke XI, ITS Surabaya.
Kaming, P.F., Raharjo, F., dan Wan, J. (2016) Persepsi Insinyur Teknik Sipil tentang Kelayakan Infrastruktur di Kalimantan Timur, Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil ke XII, ITS Surabaya.
Kodoatie, R.J., (2005) Pengantar Manajemen Infrastruktur, TS ,FT UNDIP. Pustaka Pelajar.
Kristiawan, Y.D., (2015), Analisis Kelayakan Infrastrukur Kota Metropolitan: Studi Kasus Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Tugas Akhir, TS FT UAJY.
Nurmadimah, F. (2012) Analisis Pemilihan Proyek Pengembangan Bandara UPT Dengan Skema KPS. Tesis. Fakultas Teknik, Departemen Teknik Sipil, Universitas Indonesia.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia no 3:2016 tentang Percepatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Strategis Nasional.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia no 38:2015 tentang Kerja Sama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia no 4:2016 tentang Percepatan Pembangunan Infrastruktur.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia no 67:2005 tentang Kerjasama Pemerintah dan Badan Usaha dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur.
Sanjaya, E.B., (2015) Persepsi Insinyur Teknik Sipil Mengenai Kelayakan Infrastruktur Propinsi Jawa Barat, Tugas Akhir, TS FT UAJY.
Sanusi, D.C.D., (2015) Analisis Kelayakan Infrastruktur Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Berdasarkan Penilaian Praktisi dan Akademisi Teknik Sipil. Tugas Akhir, TS FT UAJY.
Sugianto, I., (2015) Analisis Kelayakakan Infrastruktur di Provinsi Jawa Timur Berdasarkan Penilaian Praktisi dan Akademisi Teknik Sipil, Tugas Akhir, TS FT UAJY.
Toothaker, L.E., (1999) Multiple Comparison Procedure, SAGE Publication Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
1. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in the Work.
2. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the Work or derivative works for the authors personal use or for company use, provided that the source and the UMB copyright notice are indicated, the copies are not used in any way that implies UMB endorsement of a product or service of any employer, and the copies themselves are not offered for sale.
3. Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
This work is also licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
