Business Portfolio and IT Strategy Alignment: Enhancing Performance through Digital Innovation at PT Telkom Indonesia
Abstract
The telecommunications industry has been undergoing a wave of transformation due to fundamental shifts in consumer behavior, rapid technological innovation, and increasing market competition. For PT Telkom Indonesia, these changes have posed significant challenges, particularly in the Enterprise segment, where performance has declined in recent years.
Objectives: This paper analyzes the relationship between business portfolio configuration, B2B IT digital strategy, and business performance at PT Telkom Indonesia, emphasizing the intermediary role that digital innovation plays in linking strategic initiatives to performance achievements.
Methodology: Employing a quantitative design, data were drawn from 136 respondents occupying managerial positions in Telkom Indonesia’s business units. The research model was tested using PLS-SEM facilitated by SmartPLS 4.0, aiming to capture both direct linkages and the mediating impact of digital innovation across variables.
Finding: The analysis shows that while the structuring of the business portfolio does not significantly enhance business performance, the deployment of B2B IT digital strategy has a notable positive effect. Furthermore, digital innovation critically shapes organizational outcomes by serving as both a direct contributor and a mediator, reinforcing its strategic importance in converting planned initiatives into measurable value.
Conclusion: The study reveals that innovation is fundamental to strategic success. Rather than being determined solely by the formulation of business portfolios or digital strategies, Telkom Indonesia’s performance is significantly influenced by the firm's capability to operationalize these strategies through continuous innovation. These insights reinforce the critical need for digital transformation initiatives to fully integrate innovation into strategic execution frameworks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Castillo Apraiz, J., Medina, C. C., & Roldán, J. L. (2021). The role of competitive strategy in innovation and performance: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing SMEs. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100137
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
Castillo Apraiz, J., Medrano, N., & Olarte-Pascual, C. (2021). Competitive strategy, innovation, and firm performance: An empirical study in Spanish SMEs. Sustainability, 13(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010254
Chen, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). IT capabilities and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Business Research, 112, 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.007
Davenport, T. H. (2013). Process innovation and firm performance. Harvard Business Review, 91(6), 58–64.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.
Martin, L. M., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2016). Examining the mediating effect of innovation on the relationship between strategic planning and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(S1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12225
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
Pratono, A.H. (2020). Strategic Management, Innovation, and Firm Performance: Empirical Study in Indonesian Companies. Mix: Jurnal Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis, dan Kewirausahaan, 10(1), 88–97.
Rezaei, J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). A multi-criteria approach to find key determinants of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.017
Rehman, S. U., Bhatti, A., & Chaudhry, N. I. (2023). Digital strategy and firm performance: The role of digital innovation and environmental uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122083
Rufaidah, P. (2012). Analisis Portofolio Strategis Bisnis dan Strategi Inovasi dalam Menunjang Keunggulan Bersaing. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 2(2), 186–200. Retrieved from https://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_Mix/article/view/264
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Telkom Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. (2023). Annual Report 2023. https://www.telkom.co.id/minio/show/data/image_upload/page/C.2.3_Annual%20Report%20FY%202023%2C%20page%20103-121.pdf
Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., Astri, E., & Arifin, J. (2022). Digital innovation capability, organizational learning, and business performance: Evidence from Indonesian state-owned enterprises. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(1), 31–48. Retrieved from https://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_Mix/article/view/1602
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2025.v15i2.008
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen
Journal URL: http://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/Jurnal_Mix
Journal DOI: 10.22441/jurnal_mix
P-ISSN: 2088-1231
E-ISSN: 2460-5328
Editor's Address:
Magister Management Department, Universitas Mercu Buana.
Tedja Buana Building 4th Floor.
Jl. Menteng Raya No. 29, Jakarta 10340.
The Journal is Indexed and Abstracting by: