Determining priority criteria for industry 4.0 maturity models in small and medium enterprises in Indonesia

Nabilah Nabilah, Muh Hisjam, Wahyudi Sutopo

Abstract


For manufacturing companies, especially Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), currently measuring the level of the Maturity Model (MM) is not an easy thing to do, because there are still many obstacles, including not knowing what factors are priorities in developing the MM. This research aims to identify the criteria that influence the measurement of maturity model based on survey results in small and medium enterprises. Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL method to find the priority and causality of each criterion attribute. The research results show that the Advanced IT criteria is the first priority to be considered to have the most influence on measuring the industry 4.0 maturity model.


Keywords


industry 4.0; small and medium enterprises (SMEs); criteria; maturity model; Fuzzy DEMATEL

Full Text:

PDF

References


Balog, A., Băjenaru, L., & Cristescu, I. (2019). Analyzing the factors affecting the quality of IoT-based smart wearable devices using the DANP method. Studies in Informatics and Control, 28(4), 431-442.

Elmaallam, M., & Kriouile, A. (2011). Towards a model of maturity for is risk management. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 3(4), 171-188.

Gabus, A., and Fontela, E.. (1973) Perceptions of the World Problematique: Communication Procedure, Communicating with those Bearing Collective Responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1). Switzerland. Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.

Gao, H., Ju, Y., Gonzalez, E. D. S., Zeng, X. J., Dong, P., & Wang, A. (2021). Identifying critical causal criteria of green supplier evaluation using heterogeneous judgements: An integrated approach based on cloud model and DEMATEL. Applied Soft Computing, 113, 107882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107882

Han, Y., & Deng, Y. (2018). An enhanced fuzzy evidential DEMATEL method with its application to identify critical success factors. Soft computing, 22, 5073-5090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3311-x

Hu, H. Y., Chiu, S. I., Cheng, C. C., & Yen, T. M. (2011). Applying the IPA and DEMATEL models to improve the order-winner criteria: A case study of Taiwan’s network communication equipment manufacturing industry. Expert systems with applications, 38(8), 9674-9683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.147

Jiao, J., Wei, M., Yuan, Y., &Zhao, T. (2019). Risk quantification and analysis of coupled factors based on the DEMATEL model and a bayesian network. Applied Sciences, 10(1), 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010317

Jindal, A., Sharma, S. K., Sangwan, K. S., & Gupta, G. (2021). Modelling supply chain agility antecedents using fuzzy DEMATEL . Procedia CIRP, 98, 436-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.130

Kagermann, H., Lukas, W. D., & Wahlster, W. (2011). Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution. VDI nachrichten, 13(1), 2-3. Retrieved from http://www.vdi-nachrichten.com/Technik-Gesellschaft/Industrie-40- Mit

Kearney, A. (2018). Readiness for the future of production report 2018. In World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland.

Kementerian Perindustrian (2018). Indonesia’s Fourth Industrial Revolution Making Indonesia-Making Indonesia 4.0. Kementerian Perindustrian, 24-27.

Khan, S., Maqbool, A., Haleem, A., & Khan, M. I. (2020). Analyzing critical success factors for a successful transition towards circular economy through DANP approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(3), 505-529. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2019-0191

Lee, J., Lee, D., & Kang, S. (2007, June). An overview of the business process maturity model (BPMM). In Asia-Pacific Web Conference (pp. 384-395). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72909-9_42

Lin, Y. T., Yang, Y. H., Kang, J. S., & Yu, H. C. (2011). Using DEMATEL method to explore the core competences and causal effect of the IC design service company: An empirical case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6262-6268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.092

Musyarofah, S. A., Tontowi, A. E., Masruroh, N. A., & Wibowo, B. S. (2022). Comparative Study of Industry 4.0 Readiness Measurement of Indonesian Companies: INDI 4.0, IMPULS and SIRI. In Proceedings of the 1st Australian Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Sydney, Australia, available at: https://index.ieomsociety.org/index.cfm/article/view/ID/12109

Pan, J. N., & Nguyen, H. T. N. (2015). Achieving customer satisfaction through product–service systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.018

Pessl, E., Sorko, S. R., & Mayer, B. (2017). Roadmap Industry 4.0–implementation guideline for enterprises. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 5(6), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14

Proença, D., & Borbinha, J. (2018). Maturity models for data and information management: A state of the art. In Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge: 22nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2018, Porto, Portugal, September 10–13, 2018, Proceedings 22 (pp. 81-93). Springer International Publishing.

Qin, J., Crowston, K., & Kirkland, A. (2014). A Capability Maturity Model for Research Data Management.

Rockwell Automation. (2014). The connected enterprise maturity model. Rockwell Automation, 12, 1-12.

Rolling Meadows, I. T. (2005). Cobit 4.0: control objectives, management guidelines, maturity models. IT Governance Institute.

Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 52, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040

Shieh, J. I., Wu, H. H., & Huang, K. K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.01.013

Si, S. L., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C., & Zhang, P. (2018). DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457

Stanford University. (2016). Data Governance Maturity Model. from http://web.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/cgi-bin/dg/wordpress/

Zhou, Q., Huang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Safety science, 49(2), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.08.005




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/oe.2023.v15.i3.089

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2023 Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal ISSN:

Portal ISSNPrint ISSN: 2085-4293
Online ISSN: 2654-5799

Tim Editorial Office
Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering
Magister Teknik Industri Universitas Mercu Buana
Jl. Raya Meruya Selatan No. 1 Kembangan Jakarta Barat
Email: [[email protected]]
Website: http://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/oe
Journal DOI: 10.22441/oe

The Journal is Indexed and Journal List Title by:

                 

 

 

Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.