Email this article The Employee Performance Evaluation by using the Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
Abstract
Objectives: This study is aimed to develop a multi-criteria decision-making model for evaluating employee performance and provide organizations with a guideline on how to quantify employee performance.
Methodology: A hybrid approach of AHP and WSM was used in the development of the employee performance model. The AHP approach was employed to obtain the weight of each criterion. The obtained weight value is then used to calculate the performance score.
Finding: Based on the literature review and interviews, nine criteria were used, namely the achievement of work targets, job knowledge, initiative, work discipline, responsibility, teamwork, integrity, communication, and cleanliness. Based on weight calculations, it was found that achievement of the work target has the highest importance weight, followed by job knowledge, initiative, work discipline, responsibility, teamwork, integrity, communication, and cleanliness.
Conclusion: This study developed a multi-criteria decision-making model and a scoring guideline for evaluating employee performance. According to the results of the performance score, the assessed employee would fall into five categories i.e. unacceptable performance, performance is slightly under the minimum expectation, performance meets the standard and expectation, performance exceeds the standard and expectation, and extraordinary performance. The model can be used to help managers to make decisions regarding compensation which is to be given to employees by linking the employee performance category with compensation criteria.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed, I., Sultana, I., Paul, S. K., & Azeem, A. (2013). Employee performance evaluation: A fuzzy approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(7), 718–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0013
Asda, S. R., & Nilasari, B. M. (2022). The Effect of Authentic Leadership and Work Engagement on Job Performance: Evidence from DKI Jakarta Provincial Government. MIX : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(3), 524–540.
Fekete, M., & Rozenberg, I. (2014). the Practical Model of Employee Performance. Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference, 141–149.
Hoang, H. T. T., Truong, Q. H., Nguyen, A. T., & Hens, L. (2018). Multicriteria evaluation of tourism potential in the Central Highlands of Vietnam: Combining Geographic Information System (GIS), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093097
Insan, A. N., Asnawar, Nur, M., & Masmarulan. (2023). Green Human Resources Management on Turnover Intentions Mediated by Work Environment Employees. MIX : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 13(1), 208–226.
Islam, R., & Rasad, S. bin M. (2005). Employee Performance Evaluation By AHP: A Case Study. 11, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2005.028
Jeffrey, I., & Prasetya, A. B. (2019). the Employee Performance Assessment and Employee Training, on Employee Intension. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 17(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2019.017.01.07
Lidinska, L., & Jablonsky, J. (2018). AHP model for performance evaluation of employees in a Czech management consulting company. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 26(1), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-017-0486-7
Murali, S., Poddar, A., & Seema, P. A. (2017). Employee Loyalty , Organizational Performance & Performance Evaluation – A Critical Survey. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 19(8), 2319–7668. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1908036274
Murphy, K. R. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12259
Nanda, A., Soelton, M., Luiza, S., & Saratian, E. T. P. (2020). The Effect of Psychological Work Environment and Work Loads on Turnover Interest, Work Stress as an Intervening Variable. 120(Icmeb 2019), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200205.040
Nursari, S. R. C., & Murtako, A. (2020). Decision Support System for Employee Performance Evaluation with Promethe Method. Case Study: Faculty of Engineering, Pancasila University. Bit-Tech, 3(3). https://jurnal.kdi.or.id/index.php/bt/article/view/170
Prabowo, H., Pratomo, D. J., & Indriasari, I. (2023). The Effect of Work-Life Balance, Work Discipline, and Work Environment on Job Satisfaction with Teacher Performance as an Intervening. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 13(1), 176–189.
Putri, E. M., Ekowati, V. M., & Supriyanto, A. S. (2019). the Effect of Work Environment on Employee. Me, 7(April), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2653144
Qurotalain, T., Sriyono, S., & Fitriyah, H. (2022). Effect of Self Efficacy, Training, Motivation, and Competence on Organizational Commitment with Employee Performance as Intervening Variables at PT Bina Utama Sakti. Mix: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2022.v12i2.002
Rahmati, A., & Noorbehbahani, F. (2018). A new hybrid method based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for employee performance evaluation. 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation, KBEI 2017, 2018-Janua(December 2017), 0165–0171. https://doi.org/10.1109/KBEI.2017.8324965
Rodriguez, J., & Walters, K. (2017). The Importance of Training and Development in Employee Performance and Evaluation. International Journal Peer Reviewed Journal Refereed Journal Indexed Journal UGC Approved Journal Impact Factor, 3(10), 206–212. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332537797%0Awww.wwjmrd.com
Sabuhari, R., Adam, M. A., Soleman, M. M., & Jabid, A. W. (2022). THE EFFECT OF COMPETENCE: INTELLECTUAL, EMOTIONAL, AND SOCIAL ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE WITH ADAPTABILITY AS A MEDIATION VARIABLE. MIX : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(2), 293–305.
Safrizal, Tanti, L., Puspasari, R., & Triandi, B. (2019). Employee Performance Assessment with Profile Matching Method. 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674256
Saratian, E. T. P., Afri, O., Simamora, E. P., Susilowati T. (2022). Exploring Factors in Improving Funding Sales Team Performance: Case Study from Overseas Bank. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science 6(8), 63-68.
Sitopu, Y. B., Sitinjak, K. A., & Marpaung, F. K. (2021). The Influence of Motivation, Work Discipline, and Compensation on Employee Performance. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 1(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v1i2.79
Suswati, E. (2020). the Influence of Work Stress on Turnover Intention: Employee Performance As Mediator in Casual-Dining Restaurant. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 18(2), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2020.018.02.20
Yan, L., Gao, B. W., & Zhang, M. (2017). A mathematical model for tourism potential assessment. Tourism Management, 63, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.07.003
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2023.v13i2.008
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen
Journal URL: http://publikasi.mercubuana.ac.id/index.php/Jurnal_Mix
Journal DOI: 10.22441/jurnal_mix
P-ISSN: 2088-1231
E-ISSN: 2460-5328
Editor's Address:
Magister Management Department, Universitas Mercu Buana.
Tedja Buana Building 4th Floor.
Jl. Menteng Raya No. 29, Jakarta 10340.
The Journal is Indexed and Abstracting by:
1.png){kind=logo}