Profitability of Islamic Banks in the Pressure of Productive, Consumptive, and CKPNAK Problematic Financing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2026.v16i2.019Kata Kunci:
Non-Performing Financing, Profitability, Islamic Bank, Productive Financing, CKPNAKAbstrak
Objectives: The profitability of Islamic banks does not always decrease directly when non-performing financing increases. The impact is different between productive and consumptive financing, and is influenced by the dynamics of CKPNAK costs. Therefore, this assessment is important because previous research used a lot of aggregate NPFs, so it has not sufficiently explained the risk path based on financing segments. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of Problematic Productive Financing and Problematic Consumptive Financing on the profitability of Islamic banks in Indonesia, either directly or through Current Productive Financing, Current Consumptive Financing, and CKPNAK Costs.
Methodology: The study uses a quantitative approach with monthly data on the Indonesian Islamic banking industry for the period January 2010–July 2023 and analyzed using PLS-SEM.
Finding: PPB does not have a direct effect on profitability, but increases CKPNAK Costs. PKB reduces PKL and profitability directly. PKL increase profitability, while PPL does not always strengthen profitability. The novelty of this research is that this study separates the risks of productive and consumptive problematic financing and places CKPNAK as a risk transmission mechanism.
Conclusion: The profitability of Islamic banks is more accurately understood through risk management based on the financing segment.
Referensi
Abdulrehman, A. A., & Nyamute, W. (2018). Effect of mortgage financing on financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. Journal of International Business, Innovation and Strategic Management, 2(2), 91–122.
Arifin, B., & Warsidi, W. (2020). Implementasi Pembiayaan Murabahah (Studi Kasus Warung Mikro Bank Syariah Mandiri Cabang Bojonegoro ). Jurnal Justisia Ekonomika Magister Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.30651/justeko.v4i2.6864
Aristei, D., & Gallo, M. (2019). Loan Loss Provisioning by Italian Banks: Managerial Discretion, Relationship Banking, Functional Distance and Bank Risk. International Review of Economics & Finance, 60, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.10.022
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY OF THE CORPORATION: CONCEPTS, EVIDENCE, AND IMPLICATIONS. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & Colle, S. de. (2010). Stakeholder Theory. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815768
Ihwanudin, N., Maulida, S., Ilham Akbar Fatriansyah, A., Sari Rahayu, S., Nugroho, L., Widyastuti, S., Rasyid Ridha Rahman, M., Fachri, S., Rijal, K., Agrosamdhyo, R., Hanifia Senjiati, I., Ryan Isnandar, F., & Arzhi Jiwantara, F. (2020). Pengantar Perbankan Syariah (Konsep, Regulasi & Praktis). Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung. www.penerbitwidina.com
Isa, M. Y. B. M., Choong, Y. V., Fie, D. Y. G., & Rashid, M. Z. H. A. (2018). Determinants of Loan Loss Provisions of Commercial Banks in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 16(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-03-2015-0044
Kasanah, R., Abidillah, A. F., & Rusgianto, S. (2022). Assessing the Internal Factor Affecting the Bank Profitability in Indonesia: Case of Dual Banking System. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss2.art2
Matoenji, E. Y., Nugroho, L., & Soeharjoto. (2021). Determinasi Pertumbuhan Laba Bank Syariah Berdasarkan Aspek Pembiayaan UMKM, Jumlah Outlet dan Kualitas Pembiayaan. Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing Dan Perpajakan (SIKAP), 6(1), 125–140.
Misman, F. N., & Bhatti, M. I. (2020). The determinants of credit risk: An evidence from ASEAN and GCC Islamic banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(5), 89.
Mohamad, M. T., Sulaiman, A. A., Hamimah, K., & Muslim, N. (2019). The Determinants of Bank Profitability: How Malaysian Islamic Banks Response to the Financing Risk. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.612.7471
Muhamad, R., & Alwi, S. (2015). Explicating consumer segmentation and brand positioning in the Islamic financial services industry: A Malaysian perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 7(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-12-2014-0136
Mukhibad, H., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Investigating Equity-Based Financing and Debt-Based Financing in Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Isra International Journal of Islamic Finance, 15(4), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.55188/ijif.v15i4.689
Nelson, O. N. F. (2020). The Impact of Credit Risk Management on the Profitability of a Commercial Bank: The Case of BGFI Bank Congo. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v12n3p21
Nguyen, D. T. T. (2022). Factors Affecting Loan Loss Provisions During the Covid-19 Pandemic – The Case of Commercial Banks in Vietnam. European Journal of Business Management and Research, 7(3), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1421
Nugroho, L., Doktoralina, C. M., Indriawati, F., Safira, S., & Yahaya, S. (2020). Microeconomics and tawhid string relation concept (TSR). International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/516
Nugroho, L., & Mahroji, M. (2024). Dynamic Capability Theory in Islamic Bank Merger Discourse in Indonesia (Profitability, Productivity, and Efficiency Perspective). Journal of Islamic Economics, 4(2), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.55237/jie.1479747
Nugroho, L., Miglietta, F., & Nugraha, E. (2022). Islamic Bank Profitability: Financing Micro and Small Segment, Promotion, Financing Quality, Labor Aspects (Indonesia Cases). European Journal of Islamic Finance, 9(3), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.13135/2421-2172/6714
Nugroho, L., Soeharjoto, Ratnawati, N., Chaniago, N., & Firdayetti. (2024). Manajemen Pendanaan dan Pembiayaan Perbankan Syariah. Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Nyang’iye, S. A., Iraya, C., & Ochieng, D. E. (2022). Residential Mortgage Portfolio, Product Innovation and Performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya. European Journal of Business Management and Research, 7(3), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1439
Panggi, F., Amin, H., & Shaikh, I. M. (2022). Determinants of Millennials’ Acceptance Towards Tawarruq Home Financing in Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 17(2), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhma-05-2022-0067
Pramono, S. E., Rossieta, H., & Soedarmono, W. (2019). Income Smoothing Behavior and the Procyclical Effect of Loan Loss Provisions in Islamic Banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 10(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-09-2014-0032
Salman, K. R. (2021). The Effect of Non-Performing Financing and Third Party Funds on the Profitability Through Ps/Rs and PLS Financing. International Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance Research, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijibfr.v6i1.1320
Wahid, W. W., Mawardi, I., Mustofa, M. U. Al, Risyad, M. H., Nurrohman, D., & Latifah, N. (2023). The Impact of Productive and Consumptive Financings on Indonesian Islamic Banking Profitability: Markov Switching Dynamic Regression. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam (Journal of Islamic Economics and Business), 9(1), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.20473/jebis.v9i1.45639
Widarjono, A., & Rudatin, A. (2021). Financing Diversification and Indonesian Islamic Bank’s Non-Performing Financing. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 7(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol7.iss1.art4
Zulfikar, Z., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). The Impact of Discretionary Loan Loss Provision of Sharia Financing on Financial Performance. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(4), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(4).2019.04
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 MIX: JURNAL ILMIAH MANAJEMEN
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to Universitas Mercu Buana (UMB) if and when the article is accepted for publication. The undersigned hereby transfers any and all rights in and to the paper including without limitation all copyrights to UMB. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment.
We declare that this paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
Furthermore, I/We hereby transfer the unlimited rights of publication of the above mentioned paper in whole to UMB. The copyright transfer covers the right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
Retained Rights/Terms and Conditions
Although authors are permitted to re-use all or portions of the Work in other works, this does not include granting third-party requests for reprinting, republishing, or other types of re-use.
